SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025
Variants of rhinitis medicamentosa treatment: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNasal breathing dysfunction resulting from uncontrolled decongestant use is an extremely urgent public health problem. This condition is referred to as rhinitis medicamentosa. Despite the high incidence of patients with this diagnosis, there is still no consensus on treatment tactics. The purpose of this study was to review the available literature on rhinitis medicamentosa treatment and summarize the findings reported in different approaches. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a systematic review of PubMed (MEDLINE), The Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases to identify studies that describe conservative and surgical treatments for rhinitis medicamentosa.
resultsTwelve studies, including 373 patients, met the search criteria. Out of these, seven studies used topical intranasal steroids like budesonide or fluticasone propionate sprays as a conservative treatment. One study used dexamethasone nasal drops. Five studies involved surgical treatment for patients; three of these studies used radiofrequency ablation to reduce the inferior turbinates, while the other two studies used diode laser and kinetic stimulation, respectively.
conclusionAll studies included in this systematic review demonstrate the high efficacy of the separately presented treatment methods. However, the different design and evaluation methods do not allow us to systematize the data and develop a unified algorithm for treating rhinitis medicamentosa. We see the potential for conducting comparative evidence-based studies on a larger sample, along with the evaluation of long-term treatment results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40175814What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.