ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Manual Fractional Technology with CO
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Therapeutic methods and effect on keloid and hypertrophic scars: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHypertrophic scars are a common fibrotic skin disorder with a high recurrence rate. While various treatment options exist, their efficacy remains uncertain. Manual fractional technology with CO
objectiveThis study retrospectively evaluated the clinical efficacy of MFT with CO
methodsA cohort of 42 patients with 48 hypertrophic scars underwent the combination therapy thrice. Scar evaluations were conducted using the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) before treatment and one month after each session. Adverse and complication reactions were monitored, and patients were followed for 6 months post-treatment. Hypertrophic scar recurrence and patient satisfaction were assessed.
resultsThe total POSAS score significantly decreased from pre-treatment [48.00 (43.00, 53.75) VS 21.29±7.167; p<0.001]. In the subgroup analysis, treatment outcomes varied significantly by skin type, with scar quantity and genetic factors influencing remission time. The recurrence rate during the 6-month follow-up was 6.24%, with a satisfaction rate of 83.34%. No severe adverse reactions were reported.
conclusionsThe findings indicate that laser-assisted drug delivery using MFT with CO LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.