Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40175663›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2025

Chemical risk analysis competence in the Nordics is at stake.

Åke Bergman, Hrönn Jörundsdóttir, Lisbeth E Knudsen, Matti Viluksela, Jan Alexander, Åse Krøkje, Kimmo Peltonen, Jaana Rysä, Anette Schnipper, Per Sporrong and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Åke BergmanSchool of Science and Technology, Örebro University, 701 82, Örebro, Sweden. ake.bergman@oru.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3403-093X
Hrönn JörundsdóttirIcelandic Food and Veterinary Authority, Austurvegur 64, 800, Selfoss, Iceland.
Lisbeth E KnudsenDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1315, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Matti VilukselaSchool of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Jan AlexanderNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Skøyen, P.O. Box 222, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
Åse KrøkjeDepartment of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Høgskoleringen 5, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Kimmo PeltonenThe Finnish Safety and Chemicals Agency, PL 66 (Opastinsilta 12 B), 00521, Helsinki, Finland.
Jaana RysäSchool of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Anette Schnipper, Kornvej 19, 4040, Jyllinge, Denmark.
Per SporrongSchool of Science and Technology, Örebro University, 701 82, Örebro, Sweden.
Ingrid Ericson JogstenSchool of Science and Technology, Örebro University, 701 82, Örebro, Sweden.
Halldór P HalldórssonUniversity of Iceland'S Research Centre in Sudurnes, Gardvegi 1, 245, Sandgerdi, Iceland.
Annika HanbergInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, PO Box 210, 17177, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karin Sørig HougaardDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1315, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gunilla SandströmAhlsell AB, 117 98, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan ØvrevikNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Skøyen, P.O. Box 222, 0213, Oslo, Norway.
Hubert DirvenNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Skøyen, P.O. Box 222, 0213, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxicology-related experts are on a daily basis working with the safety assessment of chemicals for human health and the environment, providing knowledge applied for management and regulation of chemicals. The field of toxicology is undergoing continuous transition away from traditional safety evaluation studies in experimental animals to application of new approach methodologies (NAMs), the use of omics-related technologies, and concepts like next-generation risk assessment. This requires expertise in the new technologies but does not dismiss the need of knowledge for interpretation of in vivo studies and full understanding of chemical exposure data. A survey was initiated in 2022 in the Nordic countries to assess current and future needs for competences in risk analysis. In total, 40 replies were received from Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, while an expert assessment was performed in Iceland. The responses primarily (87.5%) came from national authorities, research institutes, industry/business, and consultants, less from the hospital system, NGOs, and others. The survey shows obvious difficulties in finding competent and trained personnel in all areas in risk analysis. Since the individual Nordic countries lack critical mass, a Nordic initiative for training and education is recommended to counteract loss of competences within chemical risk analysis in the future.

Indexed as

Risk AssessmentToxicologyScandinavian and Nordic CountriesSurveys and QuestionnairesChemicalsCompetence needsEducationRisk assessmentRisk communicationTraining

Identifiers

PMID40175663
PMCPMC12014805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.