Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40175646›Full record

ReviewCurrent obesity reports2025

Peer Intervention in Obesity and Physical Activity: Effectiveness and Implementation.

Keith J Topping

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current obesity reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Keith J ToppingEducation and Society, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, DD1 4HN, UK. k.j.topping@dundee.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0589-6796

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis paper reports the effectiveness of peer intervention in physical activity and obesity, with a focus on implementation. Peer intervention is a parallel method to traditional professional clinical processes, often targeting hard to reach populations. It includes peer education, peer counseling and peer support. RECENT

findingsThere were ten reviews on Physical Activity and seven on Obesity. Six reviews on obesity had mainly positive results; one on obesity in mental health was more negative. About two-thirds of reviews of Physical Activity interventions had positive outcomes. The overall effect was moderate. There were 39 single studies on Obesity and 46 on Physical Activity. 36% of Obesity studies and 13% of Physical Activity studies were from developing countries. Three single studies from developing countries and three from developed countries were elaborated. The extensively described implementation program was from a developed country. Discussion of limitations and strengths led to recommendations for implementation and evaluation. Overall, peer intervention in both obesity and physical activity showed quite strong evidence of effectiveness. Had all studies followed the implementation/evaluation recommendations, the strength of evidence might have been better. Future research should focus on cost-effectiveness and long-term follow-up.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth PromotionObesityPeer GroupCounselingHumansDeveloping countriesImplementationPeer counselingPeer educationPeer interventionPeer support

Identifiers

PMID40175646
PMCPMC11965182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.