ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2025
The state of targeted therapeutic pharmacological approaches in pediatric neurosurgery: report from the European Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery (ESPN) Consensus Conference 2024.
Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pediatric low-grade brainstem glioma: a review of current diagnosis and treatment paradigms in the molecular era.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Pooled it
- Laser interstitial thermal therapy in pediatric neurosurgery: a prospective nationwide study on indications, safety, and early outcomes.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe development of novel targeted therapies is opening new perspectives in the treatment of pediatric brain tumors. Their precise role in therapeutic protocols still needs still to be defined. Thus, these novel pharmacological approaches in pediatric neurosurgery were the topic of the European Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery (ESPN) Consensus Conference held in Lyon (France) in January 25-27, 2024.
methodThe paper reviews the current knowledge about targeted therapy as well as the current literature published on the topic. The conference aimed for an interdisciplinary consensus debate among pediatric oncologists and pediatric neurosurgeons on the following questions. Question 1: What is the current role for targeted therapies as neoadjuvant treatments before pediatric brain tumor removal? Question 2: What are the benefits, cost/efficiency, and long-term side effects of targeted therapies in the treatment of pediatric brain tumors? Question 3: Based on contemporary data, at which stage and in which pathologies do targeted therapies play a significant role?
resultsNinety-two participants answered consensus polls on the state of the art of targeted therapies, the ethical issues related to their use, and the evolving change in the role of pediatric neurosurgeons. The neoadjuvant role of targeted therapies is difficult to define as there are many different entities to consider. Despite the recently reported potential benefits, questions regarding the use of targeted therapies are manifold, in particular regarding sustainable benefits and long-term side effects. Additionally, challenging cost issues is a limiting factor for the broader availability of these drugs. Studies have demonstrated superiority of targeted therapy compared to chemotherapy both in randomized trials and compared to historical cohorts in the management of a subset of low-grade gliomas. The same drug combinations, BRAFi and MEKi, may be effective in HGG that have relapsed, progressed, or failed to respond to first-line therapy. Similar conclusions on efficacy may be drawn for mTORi in TSC and selumetinib in plexiform neurofibromas. For other tumors, the picture is still obscure due to the lack of data or even the lack of suitable targets. In conclusion, targeted treatment may not always be the best option even when a target has been identified. Safe surgery remains to be a favorable option in the majority of cases.
conclusionThe constantly evolving drug technology and the absence of long-term safety and efficacy studies made it difficult to reach a consensus on the predefined questions. However, a report of the conference is summarizing the present debate and it might serve as a guideline for future perspectives and ongoing research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.