Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40175624›Full record

ArticlePulmonary therapy2025

A Phase 2a, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Human Challenge Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Molnupiravir in Healthy Participants Inoculated with Respiratory Syncytial Virus.

Mickie H Cheng, Alex J Mann, Brian M Maas, Tian Zhao, Melissa Bevan, Andrea K Schaeffer, Laura E Liao, Andrew P Catchpole, David W Hilbert, S Aubrey Stoch and 1 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pulmonary therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05559905 (A Phase 2a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MK-4482 in Healthy Participants Inoculated With Experimental Respiratory Syncytial Virus), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05559905 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MK-4482 in Healthy Participants Inoculated With Experimental Respiratory Syncytial Virus

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2022 to 2023Enrolled116ConditionsRespiratory Syncytial VirusArmsMolnupiravir, Placebo, RSV A Memphis 37b
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mickie H ChengMerck & Co., Inc., 126 E. Lincoln Ave., Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA. mickie.cheng@merck.com.
Alex J MannhVIVO Services Ltd., London, UK.
Brian M MaasMerck & Co., Inc., 126 E. Lincoln Ave., Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA.
Tian ZhaoMerck & Co., Inc., 126 E. Lincoln Ave., Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA.
Melissa BevanhVIVO Services Ltd., London, UK.
Andrea K SchaefferMerck & Co., Inc., 126 E. Lincoln Ave., Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA.
Laura E LiaoMerck & Co., Inc., 126 E. Lincoln Ave., Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA.
Andrew P CatchpolehVIVO Services Ltd., London, UK.
David W HilbertMerck & Co., Inc., 126 E. Lincoln Ave., Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA.
S Aubrey StochMerck & Co., Inc., 126 E. Lincoln Ave., Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA.
Carisa S De AndaMerck & Co., Inc., 126 E. Lincoln Ave., Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA.

Funding

Merck a subsidiary of MerckMerck Co.Merck Dohme LLCMerck Funding for this research was provided by Merck SharpMerck Inc.Merck NJMerck RahwayMerck USA.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHuman respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections can result in hospitalization and/or death among vulnerable populations. Molnupiravir is a prodrug of ß-D-N4-hydroxycytidine, which has broad-spectrum preclinical activity against RNA viruses. We conducted a pilot trial evaluating molnupiravir for RSV infection.

methodsDouble-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a human challenge study in healthy adults (≥ 18 to ≤ 55 years old). Eligible participants were randomized 1:1:1 to molnupiravir prophylaxis (5 days, 800 mg twice daily; followed by placebo), molnupiravir treatment (5 days, 800 mg twice daily; started on day 5, unless triggered earlier by positive PCR test; preceded and followed by placebo), or placebo. Study intervention was administered for 11 days, from day -1 (evening), prior to inoculation with RSV on day 0 (morning). For 10 days, quarantined participants reported symptoms thrice daily and underwent nasal wash sample collection twice daily. Primary efficacy endpoints (assessed by quantitative viral culture on plaque assay) were peak viral load (PVL) in all participants (for prophylaxis) and area under the viral-load time curve (VL-AUC) in participants with confirmed infection (for treatment). Adverse events were assessed from day 0 to day 28.

resultsForty participants each were randomized to prophylaxis and placebo and 36 to treatment. Molnupiravir was not statistically significant from placebo in either primary endpoint: with prophylaxis, the difference in mean log

conclusionsAlthough the primary endpoints were not met, modest, non-significant benefits with molnupiravir treatment were seen across virologic endpoints, along with significantly faster symptom resolution. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05559905.

Indexed as

AntiviralClinical trialEfficacyHuman challengehVCMMolnupiravirRSV

Identifiers

PMID40175624
PMCPMC12102055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.