Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40175612›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2025

In-lecture quizzes improve online learning for university and community college students.

Jason C K Chan, Dahwi Ahn, Karl K Szpunar, Zohara Assadipour, Hymnjyot Gill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jason C K ChanIowa State University, Ames, IA, USA. ckchan@iastate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4221-2979
Dahwi AhnUniversity of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Karl K SzpunarToronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Zohara AssadipourIowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-2390-158X
Hymnjyot GillToronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0482-5734

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 2017333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Online classes are now integral to higher education, particularly for students at two-year community colleges, who are profoundly underrepresented in experimental research. Here, we provided a rigorous test of using interpolated retrieval practice to enhance learning from an online lecture for both university and community college students (N = 703). We manipulated interpolated activity (participants saw review slides or answered short quiz questions) and onscreen distractions (control, memes, TikTok). Our results showed that interpolated retrieval enhanced online learning for both student groups, but this benefit was moderated by onscreen distractions. Surprisingly, the presence of TikTok videos produced an ironic effect of distraction-it enhanced learning for students in the interpolated review condition, allowing them to perform similarly to students who took the interpolated quizzes. Moreover, we showed in an exploratory analysis that the intervention-induced learning improvements were mediated by a composite measure of engaged learning, thus providing a mechanistic account of our findings. Finally, our data provided preliminary evidence that interpolated retrieval practice might reduce the achievement gap for Black students.

Identifiers

PMID40175612
PMCPMC11965562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.