SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2025
A systematic review of the Da Vinci® Single-Port system (DVSP) in the context of colorectal surgery.
Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Early clinical experience with the Toumai robotic system in general surgery: a systematic review of short-term outcomes and telesurgical applications.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Operative workflow characterization of the Hugo robotic-assisted surgery and da Vinci Multiport systems in left-sided colorectal surgery: a single-institution pilot analysis.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2026Article
- Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer: The Comparison That Matters Now Is With Reduced-Access Robotic Surgery.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- Single-port versus multiport robotic colectomy for colonic neoplasia: short-term outcomes and learning-curve analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- A prospective randomized comparative trial of da Vinci SP versus da Vinci Xi in colon and rectosigmoid cancer surgery: a single-center, open-label study protocol.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Single-port robotic total colectomy: technical standardisation and ergonomic considerations of suprapubic versus periumbilical access.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Learning curve for Da Vinci Single-Port robotic colorectal cancer surgery: impact of prior robotic experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Treatment in 2026: An Updated Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Assessing the minimal invasiveness of pure single-incision da Vinci SP surgery for right-sided colon cancer: comparative analysis with the da Vinci Xi system using PSM and IPTW.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Single-port robotic colorectal surgery: a scoping review of outcome reporting and future directions for standardisation.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Beyond multiport DaVinci®: a closer look at less commonly used robotic systems in resectional colorectal surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Comparative perioperative outcomes of single-port laparoscopic ArtiSential versus da Vinci SP platform for totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a multi-institutional, propensity score-matched analysis in Korea.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluation of single-port robotic initial treatment of hernias (ESPRITH study): an initial case series following the IDEAL framework.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Current issue on special topic: robotic single-port system in general surgery.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026Article
- Simultaneous Resection of Rectal and Gastric Cancer with the da Vinci Single-Port System: A Case Report.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2026Article
- Single-incision plus one robot-assisted surgery (SIPORS) using the Hugo robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) system for rectal cancer.Annals of coloproctology · 2025Article
- The da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Platform in General Surgery: A Scoping Review of Current Applications and Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Safety and Efficacy of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic (vNOTES) Right Colectomy: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study is to review the application of the da Vinci® Single-Port system (DVSP) in colorectal surgery, with a view to assessing its safety and feasibility, and investigating its clinical and oncological outcomes.
methodsA comprehensive search of the scientific literature was conducted across three major databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane) up to November 2024. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024612762) and conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Included studies pertained to the utilisation of DVSP in the domain of colorectal surgery.
resultsEleven articles were included in the final analysis. No randomized controlled trials were identified. A total of 396 patients (199 men, 197 women) underwent robotic colorectal surgery using the DVSP. Surgical resections were indicated for benign pathology in 56 patients, colon carcinoma in 194 cases, and rectal carcinoma in 146 cases. The median incision length for Uniport placement was 4 cm. The median docking time was 5.96 min (IQR, 9.33 min), and the median console time was 105 min (IQR, 62.51 min). The mean operative time was 186.3 min (IQR, 77.65 min). Intraoperative complications were rare, with only two cases reported (0.47%). Postoperative complications occurred in 12.47% of patients, with ileus being the most common. No patients were readmitted for complications within 30 days. Short-term oncological outcomes seemed promising, with a median of 24.59 lymph nodes retrieved. There were no reported deaths within 30 days. The median follow up time was 11.4 months (IQR, 11.76 months).
conclusionThis study shows that the use of DVSP in colorectal surgery is both feasible and safe. Short-term clinical and oncological outcomes seem promising. However, longer follow-up data and larger patient cohorts are needed to fully assess the long-term efficacy of this novel technique. PROSPERO REGISTRY: Registration number CRD42024612762.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.