ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessing geometric microliths as cultural markers through an analysis of shape variation and projectile performance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
European geometric microlith shape variation is often used as a marker of cultural differences between groups of Mesolithic hunter gatherers and/or Neolithic farmers. Indeed, the 2D plan-view shape of these lithics is known to vary in spatially and temporally systematic ways between archaeological sites. Such differences are well evidenced in the Iberian Peninsula between the 9th and 8th millennia BP. Here we test an alternative hypothesis for the structured variation observed in geometric microliths: whether their plan-view shape significantly impacts the force, energy and displacement experienced when they are used as projectile tips. If functional differences between groups help to explain the shape variation observed in the archaeological record, then any role for cultural (non-functional social) explanations is potentially reduced. We undertook controlled static penetration tests using an Instron materials tester and an assemblage of replicated Iberian geometric microliths hafted to standardised wooden shafts. Results indicate that the maximum force required, energy used, and displacement at maximum force experienced by these hafted geometric microliths when used as projectile armatures is not significantly influenced by their 2D plan-view shape. Rather, gross form attributes such as maximum thickness, distance from the tip of the microlith to the start of the shaft, and the maximum width of the hafting substrate/adhesive are the greatest determinants of penetration ease, along with the positioning of the microlith when hafted. Our data therefore supports past research that proposes a cultural role for geometric microlithic shape variation in the European Mesolithic and Early Neolithic. Moreover, it highlights the functional importance of maintaining relatively thin microblades during microlith production, along with taking care to minimise the size of hafting components and the necessity to haft them in the most efficient way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.