Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40175540›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

The impact of ingestion of Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 on perinatal anxiety and depressive symptoms: a randomized controlled trial.

Lisa R Fries, Marcus Boehme, Luca Lavalle, Olga Sakwinska, Farouk Chughlay, Sonia Keddani, Nadine Porta, Maria Vicario, Gabriela Bergonzelli, Irma Silva Zolezzi and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lisa R FriesNestlé Research, Beijing, China.
Marcus BoehmeNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland. Marcus.Boehme@rd.nestle.com.
Luca LavalleClinical Research Unit, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland.
Olga SakwinskaNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland.
Farouk ChughlayClinical Research Unit, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sonia KeddaniNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nadine PortaNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland.
Maria VicarioNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland.
Gabriela BergonzelliNestlé Institute of Health Sciences, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland.
Irma Silva ZolezziNestlé Product Technology Center, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Vevey, Switzerland.
Shiao-Yng ChanSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perinatal mood disorders, including depression and anxiety, are common. Pregnant and lactating women often limit their use of medications, thus a safe and natural solution to improve mood would be welcomed. There is increasing evidence that probiotics such as Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 can influence mental well-being of adults; however, their impact on mental health during pregnancy and after birth remains unknown. The current double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, 3-parallel-arm study (N = 184) evaluated the efficacy of orally consumed B. longum (BL) NCC3001 either during pregnancy and postpartum (from approximately 30 weeks' gestation until 12 weeks after delivery) or postpartum only (from birth until 12 weeks after delivery) compared to a placebo control group in reducing depressive and anxiety symptoms assessed by EPDS and STAI self-administered questionnaires in late pregnancy and across 12 weeks postpartum. Contrary to our hypothesis, we did not observe any differences between groups in mood outcomes. Mood scores showed large variability among participants, as well as notable fluctuations within individuals over the course of the study. Additionally, it should be noted that BL NCC3001 was not detected after the intervention in all of the intervention group participants. More research is needed to understand the underpinnings of perinatal mood disturbances and microbial changes, and whether probiotics could improve mood during this period.

Indexed as

AnxietyBifidobacterium longumDepressionProbioticsAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancyYoung AdultGut-brain axisMoodPostpartum depressionProbioticsStress

Identifiers

PMID40175540
PMCPMC11965328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.