Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40175529›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Definition of the microbial rare biosphere through unsupervised machine learning.

Francisco Pascoal, Paula Branco, Luís Torgo, Rodrigo Costa, Catarina Magalhães

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francisco PascoalDepartamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2315-358X
Paula BrancoSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Luís TorgoFaculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Rodrigo CostaDepartment of Bioengineering, Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences (iBB), Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal. rodrigoscosta@tecnico.ulisboa.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5932-4101
Catarina MagalhãesDepartamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal. catarina.magalhaes@fc.up.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9576-2398

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbial rare biosphere, composed of low-abundance microorganisms in a community, lacks a standardized delineation method for its definition. Currently, most studies rely on arbitrary thresholds to define the microbial rare biosphere (e.g., 0.1% relative abundance per sample), hampering comparisons across studies. To address this challenge, we present ulrb (Unsupervised Learning based Definition of the Rare Biosphere), available as an R package. ulrb uses unsupervised machine learning to optimally classify taxa into abundance categories (e.g., rare, intermediate, or abundant) within microbial communities. We show that ulrb is more consistent than threshold-based approaches and can be applied to data derived from common microbial ecology protocols and non-microbial studies. ulrb can be used to identify different types of rarity and is statistically valid for the analysis of various dataset sizes. In conclusion, ulrb discerns rare from abundant organisms in a user-independent manner, finding applicability in selected ecological datasets.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaUnsupervised Machine LearningMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID40175529
PMCPMC11965487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.