ArticleScientific reports2025
A functional digital model of the Dingo thermal neutron imaging beamline.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adaptation of a neutron radiography instrument for live cell irradiation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, we extend our previously published Monte Carlo simulation model of the Dingo thermal neutron beamline at the Australian Centre for Neutron Scattering model by (1) including a sapphire crystal filter in the model, and (2) utilising the NCrystal package to simulate thermal neutron interactions with the crystalline structure. In addition to previous experimental measurements performed in the beamline's high-resolution mode, the beam was experimentally characterised in its high-intensity mode upstream from the sample stage (at the tertiary shutter wall exit) and these measurements were used as inputs for the model. The planar neutron distributions were optimised at both the sample stage and tertiary shutter wall exit, and model predictions were validated against experimental gold wire activation measurements. For both configurations-with and without the sapphire filter-we measured neutron fluxes, and performed neutron activation analysis using 11 materials to improve the accuracy of the neutron spectrum in the model relative to the original version. Using the optimised spectrum, we simulated out-of-beam neutron spectra that were further used as the initial input in unfolding code to explore the capability of the current solution to accurately reproduce the experimental results. The normalised neutron planar distribution from the simulation was on average within 2% at the centre, and 6% and 24% at the penumbra of the experimental results at the tertiary shutter wall exit and sample stage, respectively. The specific activities predicted by the refined model were within an average of 13% and 5% of the experimentally measured activities with and without the sapphire filter, respectively. We observed a decrease of around 45% in thermal neutron flux when the sapphire filter is used, which has been reproduced by the model. The maximum value of the logarithm of the ratio of simulated to experimental out-of-beam neutron spectra across 8 locations was 0.6 compared to 2.0 in the previous work, resulting in an average normalised root mean squared error between the unfolded spectrum and experimental measurements of 5% and 9% with and without the filter, respectively. Without the sapphire filter, the optimised predicted in-beam neutron spectrum consists of around 59% thermal, 21% epithermal and 20% fast neutrons, while the addition of the filter provides an almost pure (approximately 98%) thermal neutron beam.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.