Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40175457›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Object spatial certainty as a measure of spatial variability and its influence on attention.

Karolina J Krzyś, Carmel Avitzur, Carrick C Williams, Monica S Castelhano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karolina J KrzyśDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, 62 Arch St., Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Carmel AvitzurDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, 62 Arch St., Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Carrick C WilliamsDepartment of Psychology, California State University, San Marcos, USA.
Monica S CastelhanoDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, 62 Arch St., Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada. monica.castelhano@queensu.ca.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada NSERC RGPIN-2024-04379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some objects have specific places where you can expect them to be found (e.g., toothbrush), while others vary widely (e.g., cat). Previous studies have pointed to the importance of the spatial associations between objects and scenes in informing search strategies. However, the assumptions about objects having a specific location that they are typically found does not take into account the variability inherent in the spatial associations of objects. In the current study, we proposed a new way of measuring this variability and investigated its effects on attention and visual search. First, we developed the Object Spatial Certainty Index by having participants rate where 150 objects were expected to be found in scenes; the index provides a relative measure that ranks these objects from the most spatially predictable (almost always found in one region of the scene, e.g., boots) to the least spatially predictable (equally likely to be in every region of the scene, e.g., plant). In two experiments, we examined how these variations affected search by manipulating whether the targets were either High Certainty or Low Certainty. Our findings demonstrate that the variability of spatial association of objects significantly affected how effectively scene context influences search performance.

Indexed as

AttentionSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultScene perceptionSpatial processingVisual attentionVisual search

Identifiers

PMID40175457
PMCPMC11965496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.