Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40175451›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa from intensive care and non-intensive care units and its impact on treatment decisions.

Racha Eid, Georges Dabar, Lydia-Rossa Hanna, Gebrael Saliba, Moussa Riachy, Jacques Choucair, Rindala Saliba

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Essential role of cytochromeFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Whole genome sequencing of ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant, XDRFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Racha EidClinical Microbiology Department, Hotel Dieu de France Teaching Hospital, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Georges DabarPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Department, Hotel Dieu de France Teaching Hospital, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Lydia-Rossa HannaClinical Microbiology Department, Hotel Dieu de France Teaching Hospital, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Gebrael SalibaInfectious Diseases Department, Hotel Dieu de France Teaching Hospital, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Moussa RiachyPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Department, Hotel Dieu de France Teaching Hospital, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Jacques ChoucairInfectious Diseases Department, Hotel Dieu de France Teaching Hospital, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Rindala SalibaClinical Microbiology Department, Hotel Dieu de France Teaching Hospital, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. rindala.saliba@hdf.usj.edu.lb.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergence of difficult-to-treat-resistance (DTR) P. aeruginosa has significant implications for the selection of empirical therapies. This study aims to compare antimicrobial resistance of P. aeruginosa from ICU and non-ICU patients and to discuss empirical treatment options. Three-hundred-nine P. aeruginosa strains isolated from hospitalized patients in 2023 were included. Antimicrobial susceptibility results for six classes with potential activity against P. aeruginosa were collected. Resistance between strains isolated from ICU and non-ICU was compared. Among 309 strains, 30% were isolated from ICU patients, while 70% from non-ICU. Resistance to ciprofloxacin was significantly higher in non-ICU compared to ICU patients (64% vs. 15%, p-value = 0.0001). Resistance to piperacillin-tazobactam was higher in ICU compared to non-ICU patients (36% vs. 22%, p-value = 0.012). Prevalence of DTR P. aeruginosa was similar between the two groups (21% in ICU and 19% in non-ICU patients). Joint resistance to imipenem and ceftazidime was more prevalent in ICU patients (27% vs. 10%, p-value 0.0001). Additionally, carbapenemase-producing strains were more frequent in ICU patients (20% vs. 5%, p-value = 0.0001). Ceftolozane-tazobactam, whose effectiveness against DTR P. aeruginosa remains preserved, as empirical treatment, would improve its adequacy by 21% in ICU and 19% in non-ICU patients, compared to the currently recommended first-line treatments.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialIntensive Care UnitsPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsAgedCiprofloxacinFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationAntimicrobial resistanceCeftolozane-tazobactamDifficult-to-treat resistance P. aeruginosaEmpirical treatmentIntensive care unitMultidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID40175451
PMCPMC11965343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.