ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of combining ability and heterosis based on controlled pollination populations of eucalypt.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial hybridization remains the most effective method for genetic improvement of eucalypt, though limited research exists on the genetic basis of heterosis for interesting traits in Chinese eucalypt. We attempted to use Python in combined with SAS and SPSS to explore the relationship between parental combining ability and heterosis in controlled pollination populations of eucalypt. Our results indicated that E. urophylla had the highest general combining ability (GCA). The special combining ability (SCA) of U3423 × 3327, 06H16 × LL131, and H0733 × U6 were the highest. H0733 × U6, H0733 × P9060, and (E. urophylla × E. grandis) × 06H241 had the strongest mid-parent heterosis (MPH). U3423 × 3327, U952 × C2232, and (E. urophylla × E. grandis) × 06H241 had the strongest high-parent heterosis (HPH). We found that completely controlled by non-additive effects were (E. tereticornis × E. urophylla) × (E. urophylla), E. urophylla or (E. urophylla × E. grandis) × (open pollination). Fully controlled by additive effects were (E. tereticornis × E. urophylla) × E. camaldulensis or E. grandis, (E. urophylla) × (E. pellita × E. tereticornis), (E. urophylla × E. grandis) × E. pellita or E. tereticornis. All the findings in the present research explained the genetic basis of heterosis in eucalypt growth, and enriched the theory of hybrid breeding in eucalypt.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.