Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40175425›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development and performance optimization of a taro (Colocasia esculenta) peeling machine for enhanced efficiency in small-scale farming.

Sandeep Mann, Anil Kumar Dixit, Awani Shrivastav

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sandeep MannAgricultural Structure and Environment Control Division, ICAR-CIPHET, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Anil Kumar DixitDivision of Dairy Economics, Statistics and Management, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal, Haryana, India.
Awani ShrivastavTransfer of Technology Division, ICAR-CIPHET, Ludhiana, Punjab, India. awani.shrivastav92@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taro (Colocasia esculenta) has been a part of traditional cuisine for centuries. Taro contains an alkaloid-containing mucus just beneath the peel that causes itching when it comes into contact with the skin. Manual peeling can easily lead to itchy skin and the long exposure of peeled taro to air causes oxidation, turning the taro yellow and altering its color and flavor. To address the itching problem, a prototype peeling machine was developed. The taro peeling machine mainly comprises a peeling groove, multiple groups of rod-shaped hard brushes (brush rollers), a water spraying mechanism, a sewage outlet, a control system, a frame, and a speed changer device. In this work, a tuber peeling machine was developed and optimized for mother corm peeling. The optimized peeling conditions were found to be the rotating disc speed of 102 rpm, peeling duration of 87 s, and a batch load of 1.7 kg, which yielded a peeling efficiency of 93%, material loss of 8.3%, and peeling effectiveness of 84% were obtained. The peeling machine is designed to peel taro corms of different shapes with higher peeling efficiency and is ideal for small to medium-sized industries. The developed machine reduces the labor intensity, minimizes waste, and enhances the peeling efficiency.

Indexed as

AgricultureColocasiaMaterial lossOptimizationPeeling efficiencyShaft speedTaro peeler

Identifiers

PMID40175425
PMCPMC11965506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.