ArticleScientific reports2025
An innovative model based on machine learning and fuzzy logic for tracking lower limb exercises in stroke patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hybrid AI vision model for single-camera tracking of rehabilitation exercises: a proof of concept in clinical settings.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence with feature fusion empowered enhanced brain stroke detection and classification for disabled persons using biomedical images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multimodal machine learning to predict response to ultrasound-guided botulinum and vibration therapy in muscle spasticity a clinical and imaging correlation study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- A narrative review of AI-driven stroke rehabilitation systems through the lens of human motor learning.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rehabilitation after a stroke is vital for regaining functional abilities. However, a shortage of rehabilitation professionals leads to many patients with severe disabilities. Traditional rehabilitation methods can be time-consuming and hard to measure for progress. This study introduces an innovative machine learning (ML) approach for lower limb rehabilitation in stroke patients. The proposed methodology integrates two models: a fuzzy logic rule-based system and a K-Nearest Neighbor(K-NN) machine learning model. The rule-based model utilizes the Fugl-Meyer Assessment to evaluate lower limb angles during exercises using a camera without human intervention. The hybrid fuzzy logic-based ML model continuously tracks the desired angle, counts exercise repetitions, and provides real-time feedback on patient progress. Furthermore, it measures the Range of Motion (ROM) for each repetition, presenting a graphical visualization of ROMs for ten repetitions simultaneously. The model facilitates real-time evaluation of rehabilitation progress by clinicians, with the lowest observed error rate of [Formula: see text] of angle measurement. The K-NN model assesses rehabilitation exercise accuracy levels, presenting results graphically, with machine learning accuracy rates of [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text] for hip flexion, hip external rotation, and knee extension rehabilitation exercises. Model training utilized data from 30 experienced physical therapists at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, garnering positive evaluations from rehabilitation doctors. The proposed ML-based models offer real-time and prerecorded video capabilities, enabling telerehabilitation applications. This research highlights the potential of ML-based methodologies in stroke rehabilitation to enhance accuracy, efficiency, and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.