ArticleScientific reports2025
An improved CNN model in image classification application on water turbidity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Water turbidity is an important indicator for evaluating water clarity and plays an important role in environmental protection and ecological balance. Due to the subtle changes in water turbidity images, the differences captured are often too subtle to be classified. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) are widely used in image classification and perform well in feature extraction and classification. This study explored the application of convolutional neural networks in water turbidity classification. The innovation lies in applying CNN to water turbidity images, focusing on optimizing the CNN model to improve prediction accuracy and efficiency. The study proposed four CNN models for water turbidity classification based on artificial intelligence, and adjusted the number of model layers to improve prediction accuracy. Experiments were conducted on noise-free and noisy datasets to evaluate the accuracy and running time of the models. The results show that the CNN-10 model with a dropout layer has a classification accuracy of 96.5% under noisy conditions. This study has opened up new applications of CNN in fine-grained image classification, and further demonstrated the effectiveness of convolutional neural networks in water turbidity image classification through experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.