ArticleScientific reports2025
In situ strength assessment of rapid set concrete in real time using resonant peak parameters of embedded PZT transducers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Method for Identifying Hydration Stages of Concrete Based on Embedded Piezo-Ultrasonic Active Sensing Technology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- AI-Powered Structural Health Monitoring Using Multi-Type and Multi-Position PZT Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The in-situ concrete strength is estimated using qualitative techniques such as ultrasonic pulse velocity and the Schmidt hammer test, which are challenging to perform at inaccessible locations in large structures. Furthermore, these techniques are only successful in the outside regions of concrete casting and provide no insights for the inside regions. The researchers have been exploring new techniques using Lead Zirconate Titanate (PZT) impedance transducers for monitoring concrete strength at required locations in real-time, to optimise the construction process. However, the existing studies only establish the feasibility of the concept with limited testing and lack considering the effect of field parameters i.e., temperature and relative humidity. The present study discusses a novel technique of monitoring in-situ strength in rapid set concrete, using resonant peak parameters from the Electro-Mechanical Impedance (EMI) signatures of embedded Resin Jacketed Piezo (RJP) sensors. The developed RJP sensors are easy to manufacture and provide signatures within acceptable consistency. Different correlation models have been developed considering the effect of field parameters through extensive testing in controlled lab conditions. Also, the developed technique has been successfully implemented in a real-life bridge construction site. It was observed that there is a clear difference in the in-situ concrete strength achieved in the outer region of the pier of an under-construction bridge in comparison to the inner region. The outcomes of this study will pave in better decision making for the formwork removal in the casting yards and thus help in improving the construction rate keeping safety in concern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.