ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2025
A passive flow microreactor for urine creatinine test.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microfluidic innovations in chronic kidney disease and renal fibrosis: from mechanistic insights to clinical applications.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) significantly affects people's health and quality of life and presents a high economic burden worldwide. There are well-established biomarkers for CKD diagnosis. However, the existing routine standard tests are lab-based and governed by strict regulations. Creatinine is commonly measured as a filtration biomarker in blood to determine estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR), as well as a normalization factor to calculate urinary Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio (uACR) for CKD evaluation. In this study, we developed a passive flow microreactor for colorimetric urine creatinine measurement (uCR-Chip), which is highly amenable to integration with our previously developed microfluidic urine albumin assay. The combination of the 2-phase pressure compensation (2-PPC) technique and microfluidic channel network design accurately controls the fluidic mixing ratio and chemical reaction. Together with an optimized observation window (OW) design, a uniform and stable detection signal was achieved within 7 min. The color signal was measured by a simple USB microscope-based platform to quantify creatinine concentration in the sample. The combination of the custom in-house photomask production techniques and dry-film photoresist-based lithography enabled rapid iterative design optimization and precise chip fabrication. The developed assay achieved a dynamic linear detection range up to 40 mM and a lower limit of detection (LOD) of 0.521 mM, meeting the clinical precision requirements (comparable to existing point-of-care (PoC) systems). The microreactor was validated using creatinine standards spiked into commercial artificial urine that mimics physiological matrix. Our results showed acceptable recovery rate and low matrix effect, especially for the low creatinine concentration range in comparison to a commercial PoC uACR test. Altogether, the developed uCR-Chip offers a viable PoC test for CKD assessment and provides a potential platform technology to measure various disease biomarkers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.