ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2025
Comparison of transcriptomic points of departure with apical endpoints in developing zebrafish exposed to PFOS, PFOA, or PFHxS.
Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Zebrafish are widely leveraged for investigating per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) toxicity; however, there exists a data gap for employing zebrafish transcriptomic data for PFAS quantitative risk assessment. The present study exposed developing zebrafish at different start times and durations to 0 to 100 µM of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), and perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS) to examine chemical-specific effects on transcriptomics-based point of departure estimates (tPODs). Study goals were to investigate if the tPODs were robust to differences in exposure start and duration, were protective of zebrafish apical outcomes, and were similar to recently published PFAS tPODs in other model organisms. Zebrafish tPODs were within 1.5 orders of magnitude across the 3 chemicals, exposure durations, and start times, except for the shortest and earliest exposure (6 to 24 h post fertilization) for PFOS/PFOA. Although corresponding apical endpoints were influenced by exposure scenario, tPODs were generally lower, and thus protective of zebrafish mortality and sublethal endpoints. The relationship between our tPODs and literature zebrafish toxicity effects was chemical-specific; only the PFOA tPODs were protective of all apical effects together, and PFOS/PFHxS tPODs were generally within the interquartile range of the effects concentrations. The zebrafish PFAS tPODs were also similar to previously published fathead minnow tPODs, whereas only the PFOS zebrafish tPODs were within one order of magnitude of the Daphnia magna PFOS tPOD. Our study emphasizes that the high-throughput-compatible, in vivo developmental zebrafish platform is a feasible tool for detecting dose-dependent gene expression responses that can be leveraged for higher-tier assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.