ArticleJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2025
Sex Differences Regarding the Risk of Incident Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients with an Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Article in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic Venous Disease and In-Hospital Venous Thromboembolism in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study of the MIMIC-IV Database.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Venous thromboembolism in China: epidemiology, management strategies, and future directions.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsSex differences in the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) have so far only been sparsely described. This study aimed to investigate the differences in the risk of VTE events between male and female AECOPD patients and to determine whether any specific risk factors for VTE vary between the sexes.
methodsWe prospectively enrolled patients hospitalized for AECOPD from ten medical centers in China. The primary outcome was the occurrence of VTE. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine whether sex was an independent risk factor for VTE and also to identify any sex-specific risk factors.
resultsIn total, 13,664 patients were included. VTE occurred in 5.5% of females and 3.3% of males (P＜0.001). A multivariate logistic regression analysis identified female sex as an independent risk factor for VTE in patients with AECOPD (odds ratio [OR] = 1.439, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.177-1.759, P＜0.001) after adjusting for confounding factors. Common risk factors for both sexes included age, chronic heart failure, severe lung disease, stroke, a recent surgical history, a history of VTE, and respiratory failure. Additional risk factors unique to males were sepsis (OR = 9.514, 95% CI = 4.513-20.056, P＜0.001), varicose veins (OR = 6.170, 95% CI = 3.237-11.763, P＜0.001), and rheumatological disorders (OR = 2.677, 95% CI = 1.184-6.052, P = 0.018). No sex-specific risk factors were identified for females.
conclusionFemale sex was found to be an independent risk factor for VTE and some sex-specific risk factors exist among inpatients with AECOPD. These findings highlight the importance of considering sex and sex-related factors when assessing the VTE risk in AECOPD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.