ArticleBMJ open gastroenterology2025
Derivation and validation of lifestyle-based and microbiota-based models for colorectal adenoma risk evaluation and self-prediction.
Article in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors and prediction model for post-polypectomy metachronous colorectal adenoma.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Comment on Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Histopathological Classification in Colorectal Polyps.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- The dual roles ofFrontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Macro- and metabolome-based characterization between gut microbiota and metabolites in patients with colorectal adenomas.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEarly warning and screening of colorectal adenoma (CRA) is important for colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention. This study aimed to construct a non-invasive prediction model to improve CRA screening efficacy.
methodsThis study incorporated three cohorts, comprising 9747 participants who underwent colonoscopy. In cohort 1, 683 participants were prospectively recruited with comprehensive lifestyle information and faecal samples. CRA-associated bacteria were identified through 16S rRNA sequencing and quantitative real-time PCR. CRA prediction models were established using lifestyle and gut microbiota information. Cohort 2 prospectively enrolled 1529 participants to validate the lifestyle-based model, while cohort 3 retrospectively analysed 7535 individuals to determine the recommended initial colonoscopy screening ages for different risk groups based on age-specific CRA incidence rates.
resultsMultivariable logistic regression yielded a prediction model incorporating 14 variables, demonstrating robust discrimination (c-statistic=0.79, 95% CI 0.75, 0.82). Other machine learning approaches showed comparable performance (random forest: 0.78, 95% CI 0.73, 0.81; gradient boosting: 0.78, 95% CI 0.76, 0.83). The ages for starting colonoscopy screening were established at 42 years for the high-risk group vs 53 years for the low-risk group. The inclusion of
conclusionIntegrated mathematical modelling incorporating lifestyle parameters and gut microbial signatures provides an effective non-invasive strategy for CRA risk stratification, while the accompanying machine learning-assisted prediction application enables cost-effective, population-level screening implementation to optimise CRC prevention protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.