Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40175093›Full record

ArticleBMJ open gastroenterology2025

Derivation and validation of lifestyle-based and microbiota-based models for colorectal adenoma risk evaluation and self-prediction.

Yi-Lu Zhou, Jia-Wen Deng, Zhu-Hui Liu, Xin-Yue Ma, Chun-Qi Zhu, Yuan-Hong Xie, Cheng-Bei Zhou, Jing-Yuan Fang

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comment on Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Histopathological Classification in Colorectal Polyps.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  3. The dual roles ofFrontiers in oncology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yi-Lu Zhou *Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, NHC Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jia-Wen Deng *Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, NHC Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhu-Hui LiuDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, NHC Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xin-Yue MaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, NHC Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Chun-Qi ZhuDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, NHC Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yuan-Hong XieDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, NHC Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Cheng-Bei ZhouDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, NHC Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China jingyuanfang@sjtu.edu.cn helenairezhou@126.com.
Jing-Yuan FangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, NHC Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China jingyuanfang@sjtu.edu.cn helenairezhou@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2282-0248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEarly warning and screening of colorectal adenoma (CRA) is important for colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention. This study aimed to construct a non-invasive prediction model to improve CRA screening efficacy.

methodsThis study incorporated three cohorts, comprising 9747 participants who underwent colonoscopy. In cohort 1, 683 participants were prospectively recruited with comprehensive lifestyle information and faecal samples. CRA-associated bacteria were identified through 16S rRNA sequencing and quantitative real-time PCR. CRA prediction models were established using lifestyle and gut microbiota information. Cohort 2 prospectively enrolled 1529 participants to validate the lifestyle-based model, while cohort 3 retrospectively analysed 7535 individuals to determine the recommended initial colonoscopy screening ages for different risk groups based on age-specific CRA incidence rates.

resultsMultivariable logistic regression yielded a prediction model incorporating 14 variables, demonstrating robust discrimination (c-statistic=0.79, 95% CI 0.75, 0.82). Other machine learning approaches showed comparable performance (random forest: 0.78, 95% CI 0.73, 0.81; gradient boosting: 0.78, 95% CI 0.76, 0.83). The ages for starting colonoscopy screening were established at 42 years for the high-risk group vs 53 years for the low-risk group. The inclusion of

conclusionIntegrated mathematical modelling incorporating lifestyle parameters and gut microbial signatures provides an effective non-invasive strategy for CRA risk stratification, while the accompanying machine learning-assisted prediction application enables cost-effective, population-level screening implementation to optimise CRC prevention protocols.

Indexed as

AdenomaColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLife StyleAdultAgedAge FactorsColonoscopyFecesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCOLONIC ADENOMASCOLONIC MICROFLORACOLONIC NEOPLASMSCOLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING

Identifiers

PMID40175093
PMCPMC12001358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.