Selection and reporting of usual care comparators when designing primary care trials of complex health interventions: a systematic review.

backgroundMany primary care trials evaluating complex health interventions use a 'usual care' comparator. As usual care can vary across clinical sites, countries, and over time thereby affecting trial design and raising ethical considerations, attention should be given to its content prior to a trial starting.

aimTo understand how researchers select and describe usual care comparators when designing primary care trials of complex health interventions. DESIGN AND

settingA systematic review of primary care trial or feasibility study protocols undertaken worldwide.

methodElectronic databases were searched from 1 July 2020 until 20 June 2022.

resultsA total of 83 protocols were included. A range of terms such as 'usual care' and 'care as usual' were used to describe usual care. Descriptions of usual care varied greatly in terms of the level of detail provided regarding selection and content, and were categorised according to the amount of detail they provided: basic (72%), moderate (16%), and comprehensive (12%). Few protocols justified the content of their usual care comparator, with most simply commenting that it was based on clinical guidelines or current practice.

conclusionDifferent terms were used to describe usual care and most primary care researchers provided limited details on the selection and content of their usual care comparators when publishing study protocols. This has implications for transparency and replicability, and suggests that researchers continue to give limited attention to the content of usual care when designing their trials.