Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40174976›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2025

Expanding access to sexual and reproductive health and rights through evidence-based policy dialogue: implications for practice from a multicountry initiative.

Ulrika Rehnstrom Loi, Amy Coates, Offeibea Obubah, Frank Noij, Katy Footman, Antonella Lavelanet, Hyobum Jang, Laurence Codjia, Laurence Läser, Tesfaye Tufa and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Ulrika Rehnstrom Loi *UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/ World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland rehnstromu@who.int.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3455-8606
Amy Coates *Department of Country Strategy and Support, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Offeibea ObubahDepartment of Country Strategy and Support, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Frank NoijUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/ World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Katy FootmanUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/ World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8606-7326
Antonella LavelanetUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/ World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hyobum JangDepartment of Country Strategy and Support, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6954-8512
Laurence CodjiaDepartment of Health Workforce, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Laurence LäserUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/ World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Tesfaye TufaUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/ World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Leopold OuedraogoWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Nilmini HemachandraWorld Health Organisation Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt.
Karima GholbzouriWorld Health Organisation Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt.
Meera UpadhyayWorld Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, India.
Neena RainaWorld Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, India.
Dina GbenouWorld Health Organization, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Souleymane ZanWorld Health Organization, Cotonou, Benin.
Thierry Tossou BocoWorld Health Organization, Cotonou, Benin.
Theopista John KabuteniWorld Health Organization, Kigali, Rwanda.
Maria Mugabo MujawamariyaWorld Health Organization, Kigali, Rwanda.
Priya KarnaWorld Health Organization, New Delhi, India.
Ram ChaharWorld Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, India.
Amrita KansalWorld Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, India.
Ellen ThomWorld Health Organization, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Qudsia UzmaWorld Health Organization, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Dan KassVital Strategies, New York, New York, USA.
Carisse HamletVital Strategies, New York, New York, USA.
Adam KarpatiVital Strategies, New York, New York, USA.
Shambhu AcharyaDepartment of Country Strategy and Support, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Bela GanatraUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/ World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4812-4577

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPolicy dialogue is an important component of evidence-based policy-making. In 2019, WHO and Ministry of Health staff in 15 countries participated in an initiative that involved training and implementation of country-level sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) policy dialogues. An evaluation of the process and outcomes was subsequently undertaken in six of the countries.

methodsThe three-stage policy dialogue initiative included a preparatory phase to develop stakeholder analyses and policy briefs and a 2-day workshop to develop an action plan, followed by continuous support as the national teams implemented the action plans. A participatory, multimethod approach was used to evaluate the policy dialogue initiative, including a desk review of initiative documentation and interviews with project participants.

resultsParticipants reported positive experiences of the policy dialogue initiative and felt it improved their knowledge, skills and confidence. The ensuing policy dialogue activities in each country contributed to some SRHR policy development and/or implementation changes. The policy dialogue initiative supported these changes through its practical approach to learning and ongoing technical support. However, the impact of policy dialogues varied depending on political factors, the scope of policy goals, alignment with existing country priorities and stakeholder engagement. Furthermore, facilitating factors included strong support networks, incremental working and preparation for backlash against SRHR.

conclusionsOur experience highlights the value of policy dialogue for progressing SRHR policy change at the national level and the need for further investments in strengthening the skills of health decision-makers required for effective policy dialogue.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityPolicy MakingReproductive HealthReproductive RightsSexual HealthHumansStakeholder ParticipationWorld Health OrganizationHealth policyHealth systems

Identifiers

PMID40174976
PMCPMC12164306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.