Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40174957›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2025

Pro: Clinical remission in asthma - implications for asthma management.

Stefania Principe, Nizar N Jarjour

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. CompEx Asthma: is it time for a change in clinical trials?The European respiratory journal · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefania PrincipeAmsterdam UMC, Location Vrije University Medical Center, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nizar N JarjourDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA nnj@medicine.wisc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asthma treatment has seen significant advancements over the recent years. However, despite improvements in disease control, some patients continue to experience persistent symptoms and exacerbations, necessitating a deeper understanding of disease mechanisms and optimisation of treatment strategies. The introduction of biologics has marked a new era in severe asthma management, targeting underlying molecular mechanisms and raising the possibility of achieving asthma remission. Key indicators of remission include high asthma control, absence of exacerbations and stabilised, or normalised, lung function. However, there is currently no common definition for remission, with various studies using different criteria. Real-world studies and

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaBiological ProductsLungHumansRecovery of FunctionRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeAnti-Asthmatic AgentsBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID40174957
PMCPMC11963004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.