Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40173433›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Early Prediction of Delirium in Intensive Care Units Using Continuous Physiological Data: Retrospective Study.

Chanmin Park, Changho Han, Su Kyeong Jang, Hyungjun Kim, Sora Kim, Byung Hee Kang, Kyoungwon Jung, Dukyong Yoon

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chanmin ParkDepartment of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6088-6048
Changho HanDepartment of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4121-5465
Su Kyeong JangBUD.on Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0313-5491
Hyungjun KimBUD.on Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4040-3715
Sora KimAjou University Hospital Gyeonggi South Regional Trauma Center, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9787-2339
Byung Hee KangDepartment of Surgery, Division of Trauma Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3204-3251
Kyoungwon JungDepartment of Surgery, Division of Trauma Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7895-0362
Dukyong YoonDepartment of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1635-8376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelirium in intensive care unit (ICU) patients poses a significant challenge, affecting patient outcomes and health care efficiency. Developing an accurate, real-time prediction model for delirium represents an advancement in critical care, addressing needs for timely intervention and resource optimization in ICUs.

objectiveWe aimed to create a novel machine learning model for delirium prediction in ICU patients using only continuous physiological data.

methodsWe developed models integrating routinely available clinical data, such as age, sex, and patient monitoring device outputs, to ensure practicality and adaptability in diverse clinical settings. To confirm the reliability of delirium determination records, we prospectively collected results of Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) evaluations performed by qualified investigators from May 17, 2021, to December 23, 2022, determining Cohen κ coefficients. Participants were included in the study if they were aged ≥18 years at ICU admission, had delirium evaluations using the CAM-ICU, and had data collected for at least 4 hours before delirium diagnosis or nondiagnosis. The development cohort from Yongin Severance Hospital (March 1, 2020, to January 12, 2022) comprised 5478 records: 5129 (93.62%) records from 651 patients for training and 349 (6.37%) records from 163 patients for internal validation. For temporal validation, we used 4438 records from the same hospital (January 28, 2022, to December 31, 2022) to reflect potential seasonal variations. External validation was performed using data from 670 patients at Ajou University Hospital (March 2022 to September 2022). We evaluated machine learning algorithms (random forest [RF], extra-trees classifier, and light gradient boosting machine) and selected the RF model as the final model based on its performance. To confirm clinical utility, a decision curve analysis and temporal pattern for model prediction during the ICU stay were performed.

resultsThe κ coefficient between labels generated by ICU nurses and prospectively verified by qualified researchers was 0.81, indicating reliable CAM-ICU results. Our final model showed robust performance in internal validation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC]: 0.82; area under the precision-recall curve [AUPRC]: 0.62) and maintained its accuracy in temporal validation (AUROC: 0.73; AUPRC: 0.85). External validation supported its effectiveness (AUROC: 0.84; AUPRC: 0.77). Decision curve analysis showed a positive net benefit at all thresholds, and the temporal pattern analysis showed a gradual increase in the model scores as the actual delirium diagnosis time approached.

conclusionsWe developed a machine learning model for delirium prediction in ICU patients using routinely measured variables, including physiological waveforms. Our study demonstrates the potential of the RF model in predicting delirium, with consistent performance across various validation scenarios. The model uses noninvasive variables, making it applicable to a wide range of ICU patients, with minimal additional risk.

Indexed as

DeliriumIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studiesdeliriumearly predictionintensive care unitmachine learningprediction model

Identifiers

PMID40173433
PMCPMC12004028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.