Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40173432›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Conversion of Sensitive Data to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model: Protocol for the Development and Use of Carrot.

Samuel Cox, Erum Masood, Vasiliki Panagi, Calum Macdonald, Gordon Milligan, Scott Horban, Roberto Santos, Chris Hall, Daniel Lea, Simon Tarr and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Samuel CoxDigital Research Service, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9841-9816
Erum MasoodHealth Informatics Centre, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8790-5352
Vasiliki PanagiDigital Research Service, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4206-4024
Calum MacdonaldUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7857-9188
Gordon MilliganHealth Informatics Centre, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1171-5234
Scott HorbanHealth Informatics Centre, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6431-8243
Roberto SantosDigital Research Service, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1333-2605
Chris HallHealth Informatics Centre, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1368-4619
Daniel LeaDigital Research Service, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8152-0398
Simon TarrDigital Research Service, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8464-1240
Shahzad MumtazHealth Informatics Centre, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2606-2405
Emeka AkashiliDigital Research Service, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0001-5739-9812
Andy RaeNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0004-8544-2576
Esmond UrwinNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4626-2172
Christian ColeHealth Informatics Centre, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2560-2484
Aziz SheikhUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7022-3056
Emily JeffersonHealth Informatics Centre, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2992-7582
Philip Roy QuinlanNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3012-6646

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V03488X/1Medical Research Council MR/W014335/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of data standards is low across the health care system, and converting data to a common data model (CDM) is usually required to undertake international research. One such model is the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM. It has gained substantial traction across researchers and those who have developed data platforms. The Observational Health Care Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) partnership manages OMOP and provides many open-source tools to assist in converting data to the OMOP CDM. The challenge, however, is in the skills, knowledge, know-how, and capacity within teams to convert their data to OMOP. The European Health Care Data Evidence Network provided funds to allow data owners to bring in external resources to do the required conversions. The Carrot software (University of Nottingham) is a new set of open-source tools designed to help address these challenges while not requiring data access by external resources.

objectiveThe use of data protection rules is increasing, and privacy by design is a core principle under the European and UK legislations related to data protection. Our aims for the Carrot software were to have a standardized mechanism for managing the data curation process, capturing the rules used to convert the data, and creating a platform that can reuse rules across projects to drive standardization of process and improve the speed without compromising on quality. Most importantly, we aimed to deliver this design-by-privacy approach without requiring data access to those creating the rules.

methodsThe software was developed using Agile approaches by both software engineers and data engineers, who would ultimately use the system. Experts in OMOP were used to ensure the approaches were correct. An incremental release program was initiated to ensure we delivered continuous progress.

resultsCarrot has been delivered and used on a project called COVID-Curated and Open Analysis and Research Platform (CO-CONNECT) to assist in the process of allowing datasets to be discovered via a federated platform. It has been used to create over 45,000 rules, and over 5 million patient records have been converted. This has been achieved while maintaining our principle of not allowing access to the underlying data by the team creating the rules. It has also facilitated the reuse of existing rules, with most rules being reused rather than manually curated.

conclusionsCarrot has demonstrated how it can be used alongside existing OHDSI tools with a focus on the mapping stage. The COVID-Curated and Open Analysis and Research Platform project successfully managed to reuse rules across datasets. The approach is valid and brings the benefits expected, with future work continuing to optimize the generation of rules. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/60917.

Indexed as

Computer SecuritySoftwareHumansObservational Studies as TopicCarrot toolcommon data modeldata discoverydata modeldata privacydata protectiondata standarddata standardizationETLextract, transform, and loadhealth careObservational Medical Outcomes PartnershipOMOPopen-sourcetransparency

Identifiers

PMID40173432
PMCPMC12004012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.