Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40173424›Full record

ArticleInvestigative radiology2025

PixelPrint 4D : A 3D Printing Method of Fabricating Patient-Specific Deformable CT Phantoms for Respiratory Motion Applications.

Jessica Y Im, Neghemi Micah, Amy E Perkins, Kai Mei, Michael Geagan, Leonid Roshkovan, Peter B Noël

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Update of
    2024
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jessica Y ImDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (J.Y.I., K.M., M.G., L.R., P.B.N.); Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (J.Y.I.); Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA (N.M.); and Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH (A.E.P.).ORCID 0000-0002-6607-872
Neghemi Micah
Amy E Perkins
Kai Mei
Michael Geagan
Leonid Roshkovan
Peter B Noël

Funding

Patient-specific, high-sensitivity spectral CT for assessment of pancreatic cancerR01EB030494 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GANG, JIANAN GRACE, NOËL, PETER B · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
PixelPrint: a 3D printing platform for creating lifelike patient-based CT phantomsR01EB035092 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Peter B Noel · 2024 to 2026
$1.8M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030494NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB035092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRespiratory motion poses a significant challenge for clinical workflows in diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Many technologies such as motion artifact reduction and tumor tracking have been developed to compensate for its effect. To assess these technologies, respiratory motion phantoms (RMPs) are required as preclinical testing environments, for instance, in computed tomography (CT). However, current CT RMPs are highly simplified and do not exhibit realistic tissue structures or deformation patterns. With the rise of more complex motion compensation technologies such as deep learning-based algorithms, there is a need for more realistic RMPs. This work introduces PixelPrint 4D , a 3D printing method for fabricating lifelike, patient-specific deformable lung phantoms for CT imaging. MATERIALS AND

methodsA 4DCT dataset of a lung cancer patient was acquired. The volumetric image data of the right lung at end inhalation was converted into 3D printer instructions using the previously developed PixelPrint software. A flexible 3D printing material was used to replicate variable densities voxel-by-voxel within the phantom. The accuracy of the phantom was assessed by acquiring CT scans of the phantom at rest, and under various levels of compression. These phantom images were then compiled into a pseudo-4DCT dataset and compared to the reference patient 4DCT images. Metrics used to assess the phantom structural accuracy included mean attenuation errors, 2-sample 2-sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test on histograms, and structural similarity index (SSIM). The phantom deformation properties were assessed by calculating displacement errors of the tumor and throughout the full lung volume, attenuation change errors, and Jacobian errors, as well as the relationship between Jacobian and attenuation changes.

resultsThe phantom closely replicated patient lung structures, textures, and attenuation profiles. SSIM was measured as 0.93 between the patient and phantom lung, suggesting a high level of structural accuracy. Furthermore, it exhibited realistic nonrigid deformation patterns. The mean tumor motion errors in the phantom were ≤0.7 ± 0.6 mm in each orthogonal direction. Finally, the relationship between attenuation and local volume changes in the phantom had a strong correlation with that of the patient, with analysis of covariance yielding P  = 0.83 and f  = 0.04, suggesting no significant difference between the phantom and patient.

conclusionsPixelPrint 4D facilitates the creation of highly realistic RMPs, exceeding the capabilities of existing models to provide enhanced testing environments for a wide range of emerging CT technologies.

Indexed as

Four-Dimensional Computed TomographyLung NeoplasmsPhantoms, ImagingPrinting, Three-DimensionalRespirationArtifactsHumansLung3D printed phantom4DCTCT imaging phantomCT ventilation imagingdeformable image registrationdeformable lung phantommotion correctionradiation therapyrespiratory motion compensationrespiratory motion phantom

Identifiers

PMID40173424
PMCPMC12353425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.