Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40173409›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2025

Water immunity overrides stomatal immunity in plant resistance to Pseudomonas syringae.

Jasmin Kemppinen, Maximillian Pollmeier, Sanna Ehonen, Mikael Brosché, Maija Sierla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jasmin KemppinenOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5124-6973
Maximillian PollmeierOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0009-0005-4868-8929
Sanna EhonenOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6392-9410
Mikael BroschéOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1135-2496
Maija SierlaOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, and Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8493-3582

Funding

Centre of Excellence in Tree Biology 2022-2029Research Council of Finland 333703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stomata play crucial roles in the multilayered defense system against pathogens. Upon pathogen perception, stomata close promptly, establishing the first line of defense known as stomatal immunity. The bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae (Pst) exploits open stomata for entry into its host. However, it can also induce stomatal closure at post-invasive stages to enhance apoplastic hydration, creating a favorable environment for Pst proliferation, evident as water-soaked lesions on leaves. During the post-invasive stages of Pst infection, plants reopen their stomata to promote apoplastic dehydration, establishing the second layer of stomatal defense termed water immunity. To evaluate the relative importance of stomatal versus water immunity, we utilized a diverse set of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants with impaired stomatal function and monitored bacterial growth, stomatal behavior, and water-soaking capacity after Pst pv. tomato DC3000 infection. Most mutants with constitutively open stomata and disrupted stomatal closure were more resistant to Pst than wild-type plants. Also, while some mutants displayed similar stomatal behavior at the initial stages of defense, their disease outcomes were opposite, suggesting that stomatal immunity does not determine disease resistance. Instead, the water-soaking capacity, which is associated with stomatal status at later stages of infection (i.e. water immunity), dictates disease outcome. Our results show that enhanced water immunity can override the lack of stomatal immunity in plant resistance to Pst. We also address previous discrepancies in the literature showing contradicting results for pathogen growth on stomatal mutants, highlighting the challenges in dissecting stomatal effects on plant disease resistance.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisDisease ResistancePlant DiseasesPlant ImmunityPlant StomataPseudomonas syringaeWaterMutationWater

Identifiers

PMID40173409
PMCPMC12063527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.