Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40173389›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Understanding patterns of loneliness in older long-term care users using natural language processing with free text case notes.

Sam Rickman, Jose-Luis Fernandez, Juliette Malley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sam RickmanCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1921-5258
Jose-Luis FernandezCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4190-7341
Juliette MalleyCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5759-1647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loneliness and social isolation are distressing for individuals and predictors of mortality, yet data on their impact on publicly funded long-term care is limited. Using recent advances in natural language processing (NLP), we analysed pseudonymised administrative records containing 1.1 million free-text case notes about 3,046 older adults recorded in a London council between 2008 and 2020. We applied three NLP methods-document-term matrices, pre-trained embeddings, and transformer-based models-to identify loneliness or social isolation. The best-performing model, a bidirectional transformer, achieved an F1 score of 0.92 on a test set of unseen sentences. Using this model, we generated predictions for the full dataset and assessed construct validity through comparison with survey data and the literature. Our measure is associated with expected characteristics, such as living alone and impaired memory, and is a strong predictor of social inclusion services. Approximately 43% of individuals had a sentence indicating loneliness or isolation in their case notes at their initial care assessment, comparable to survey-based estimates. Unlike surveys, our indicator is linked to other administrative data, enabling development of models of service use with loneliness or isolation as independent variables. An open-source version of the model is available in a GitHub repository.

Indexed as

LonelinessLong-Term CareNatural Language ProcessingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLondonMaleSocial Isolation

Identifiers

PMID40173389
PMCPMC11964460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.