ArticlePloS one2025
Assessing interface accuracy in macromolecular complexes.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- PepScorer::RMSD: An Improved Machine Learning Scoring Function for Protein-Peptide Docking.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Structure Modeling Protocols for Protein Multimer and RNA in CASP16 With Enhanced MSAs, Model Ranking, and Deep Learning.Proteins · 2026Article
- Enhancing Local Functional Structure Features to Improve Drug-Target Interaction Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately predicting the 3D structures of macromolecular complexes is becoming increasingly important for understanding their cellular functions. At the same time, reliably assessing prediction quality remains a significant challenge in bioinformatics. To address this, various methods analyze and evaluate in silico models from multiple perspectives, accounting for both the reconstructed components' structures and their arrangement within the complex. In this work, we introduce Intermolecular Interaction Network Fidelity (I-INF), a normalized similarity measure that quantifies intermolecular interactions in multichain complexes. Adapted from a well-established score in the RNA field, I-INF provides a clear and intuitive way to evaluate the predicted 3D models against a reference structure, with a specific focus on interchain interaction sites. Additionally, we implement the F1 measure to assess interfaces in macromolecular assemblies, further enriching the evaluation framework. Tested on 72 RNA-protein decoys, as well as exemplary DNA-DNA, RNA-RNA, and protein-protein complexes, these measures deliver reliable scores and enable straightforward ranking of predictions. The tool for computing I-INF and F1 is publicly available on Zenodo, facilitating large-scale analysis and integration with other computational systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.