ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2025
Electrical properties based
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ticept: Wideband Electrical Properties Tomography by Tissue Composition Assessment With QuantitativeMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Electrical properties basedMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn MR electrical properties tomography (EPT), conductivity and permittivity are reconstructed from MR measurements. However, depending on the reconstruction method, reconstructed electrical properties (EPs) show large variability in vivo, reducing confidence in the reconstructed values for clinical application in practice. To overcome this problem we present a method to evaluate the reconstructed EPs using a physics-based
methodsA physics-based method using a finite difference based recurrent relation is used to estimate the
resultsThe simulation experiments show that the
conclusionWith the proposed method,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.