ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2025
The Burden of Fecal Incontinence: Evaluating the Societal Impact in Terms of Economic Burden and Health-Related Quality of Life.
Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measuring health-related quality of life and well-being in adults with fecal incontinence: a comparative psychometric evaluation.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2026Trial
- Editorial: A New Insert Device for Faecal Incontinence-To Use or Not to Use?Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Associations between five anthropometric indices and fecal incontinence: A cross-sectional study based on the 2005 to 2010 NHANES data.Medicine · 2026Article
- Change in faecal incontinence pattern after gastric bypass surgery: related to change in anal sphincter thickness?International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFecal incontinence (FI) is a chronic condition characterized by the involuntary loss of stool, significantly impacting health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and imposing a substantial economic burden on society.
methodsThis bottom-up, retrospective, cross-sectional burden of disease study offers a comprehensive cost analysis of FI in a Dutch population sample. Utilizing the iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (MCQ) and the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (PCQ), we analyzed costs over a 3-month period from a societal perspective, which encompasses healthcare costs, out-of-pocket expenses, and productivity losses. Non-parametric bootstrapping was applied to identify differences in costs between several subgroups of patients. Additionally, we assessed HRQoL using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. Differences in HRQoL between subgroups were determined using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test.
resultsCost and HRQoL data were collected from 80 FI patients aged 39-89 (82.5% female). The mean societal costs were €2424 per patient per quarter, of which €1572 can be contributed to healthcare costs. Notably, unemployed patients incurred significantly higher costs compared to employed and retired patients. No significant difference in costs was seen between subgroups based on gender, age, educational level, or frequency of FI episodes. The mean HRQoL score was 0.72 (SD 0.78). Younger and unemployed patients reported lower HRQoL scores.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that FI negatively impacts HRQoL and has a considerable impact on societal costs, extending beyond direct healthcare expenses. Policymakers, healthcare providers, and employers should take these findings into account when designing management strategies and allocating resources for FI treatment and support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.