Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40173266›Full record

ReviewVeterinary medicine and science2025

Applications and Considerations of Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Sciences: A Narrative Review.

Hesameddin Akbarein, Mohammad Hussein Taaghi, Mahyar Mohebbi, Parham Soufizadeh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary medicine and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hesameddin AkbareinDepartment of Food Hygiene & Quality Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Hussein TaaghiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Mahyar MohebbiDepartment of Surgery and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Parham SoufizadehFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7712-0455

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has brought about a significant transformation in healthcare, streamlining manual tasks and allowing professionals to focus on critical responsibilities while AI handles complex procedures. This shift is not limited to human healthcare; it extends to veterinary medicine as well, where AI's predictive analytics and diagnostic abilities are improving standards of animal care. Consequently, healthcare systems stand to gain notable advantages, such as enhanced accessibility, treatment efficacy, and optimized resource allocation, owing to the seamless integration of AI. This article presents a comprehensive review of the manifold applications of AI within the domain of veterinary science, categorizing them into four domains: clinical practice, biomedical research, public health, and administration. It also examines the primary machine learning algorithms used in relevant studies, highlighting emerging trends in the field. The research serves as a valuable resource for scholars, offering insights into current trends and serving as a starting point for those new to the field.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceVeterinary MedicineAnimalsMachine Learningartificial Intelligencemachine learningveterinary sciences

Identifiers

PMID40173266
PMCPMC11964155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.