Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40173205›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Reduced occludin expression is related to unfavorable tumor phenotype and poor prognosis in many different tumor types: A tissue microarray study on 16,870 tumors.

Seyma Büyücek, Florian Viehweger, Viktor Reiswich, Natalia Gorbokon, Viktoria Chirico, Christian Bernreuther, Florian Lutz, Simon Kind, Ria Schlichter, Sören Weidemann and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Seyma BüyücekInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9106-6595
Florian ViehwegerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Viktor ReiswichInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Natalia GorbokonInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Viktoria ChiricoInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian BernreutherInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Florian LutzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Simon KindInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ria SchlichterInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sören WeidemannInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Till S ClauditzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Andrea HinschInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ahmed Abdulwahab BawahabPathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Frank JacobsenInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas M LuebkeInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
David DumInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7884-4313
Claudia Hube-MaggInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-4340
Martina KluthInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Katharina MöllerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Anne MenzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas H MarxDepartment of Pathology, Academic Hospital Fuerth, Fuerth Germany.
Till KrechInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Patrick LebokInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christoph FrauneInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Guido SauterInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ronald SimonInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0158-4258
Eike BurandtInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sarah MinnerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan SteurerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Maximilian LennartzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1572-8200
Morton FreytagInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3841-444X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occludin is a key component of tight junctions. Reduced occludin expression has been linked to cancer progression in individual tumor types, but a comprehensive and standardized analysis across human tumor types is lacking. To study the prevalence and clinical relevance of occludin expression in cancer, a tissue microarray containing 16,870 samples from 148 different tumor types and 608 samples of 76 different normal tissue types was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Occludin immunostaining was observed in 10,746 (76.6%) of 14,017 analyzable tumors, including 18.9% with weak, 16.2% with moderate, and 41.6% with strong staining intensity. Occludin positivity was found in 134 of 148 tumor categories and was most frequent in adenocarcinomas (37.5-100%) and neuroendocrine neoplasms (67.9-100%), less common in squamous cell carcinomas (23.8-93%) and in malignant mesotheliomas (up to 48.1%), and rare in Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (1-2%) and most mesenchymal tumors. Reduced occludin staining was linked to adverse tumor features in several tumor types, including colorectal adenocarcinoma (advanced pT stage, p < 0.0001; L1 status, p = 0.0384; absence of microsatellite instability, p < 0.0001), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (advanced pT stage, p = 0.005), clear cell renal cell carcinoma (high ISUP grade, p < 0.0001; advanced pT stage, p < 0.0001; high UICC stage, p < 0.0001; distant metastasis, p = 0.0422; shortened overall or recurrence-free survival, p ≤ 0.0116), papillary renal cell carcinoma (high pT stage, p < 0.0001; high UICC stage, p = 0.0228; distant metastasis, p = 0.0338; shortened recurrence-free survival, p = 0.006), and serous high-grade ovarian cancer (advanced pT stage, p = 0.0133). Occludin staining was unrelated to parameters of tumor aggressiveness in breast, gastric, endometrial, and thyroidal cancer. Our data demonstrate significant levels of occludin expression in many different tumor entities and identify reduced occludin expression as a potentially useful prognostic feature in several tumor entities.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsOccludinAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypePrognosisTissue Array AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorOccludinOCLN protein, human

Identifiers

PMID40173205
PMCPMC11964279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.