ArticlePloS one2025
RETRACTED: Evaluation of all-for-one tourism development level: Evidence from Xinjiang production and construction corps, China.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2026-06-23Compromised Peer Review · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Objections by Author(s) ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
All-for-one tourism represents a pivotal strategy to facilitate the transformation and enhancement of the tourism sector and promote the coordinated development of the economy and society within the contemporary context of China. Since its introduction by the Ministry of Culture and Tourism in 2016, governments at all levels have actively promoted the development of all-for-one tourism with remarkable results. Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC), a unique governance system in Xinjiang, is rich in natural and cultural tourism resources and has achieved specific results in developing all-for-one tourism. Nevertheless, it also faces the outstanding problems of a low level of development and insufficient motivation. Therefore, this study focused on the XPCC as the research area and established an evaluation index system to assess the level of all-for-one tourism development across three dimensions: tourism potential, tourism benefit, and tourism format. Subsequently, a comprehensive analysis was conducted regarding the development level, spatial distribution characteristics, the coupling and coordination mechanisms among these dimensions, and the classification of tourism destinations. The results show that (1) XPCC's four major regions have unbalanced all-for-one tourism development, revealing disparities among divisions. (2) Spatial analysis shows that the Tianshan North Slope is advantageous, while southern Xinjiang and border areas are disadvantageous. (3) The coupling degree spans four stages, with significant differences in spatial distribution. (4) Tourism destinations can be categorized into three types: industrial integration-driven, economic and social-driven, and advantageous resource-driven. Accordingly, the optimization development strategies for all-for-one tourism in the XPCC were proposed: (1) integrating resources to optimize supply, (2) enhancing infrastructure to improve services, (3) deepening industrial integration, (4) strengthening brand building, (5) promoting regional cooperation. These strategies provide insights for optimizing all-for-one tourism development in similar regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.