Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40173193›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Community-led strategies for communicable disease prevention and management in low- and middle- income countries: A mixed-methods systematic review of health, social, and economic impact.

Pitchaya P Indravudh, Kathleen McGee, Euphemia L Sibanda, Elizabeth L Corbett, Katherine Fielding, Fern Terris-Prestholt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Co-Designing Physical Activity Programmes: A Participatory Research Study With Culturally Diverse Women and Local Government.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pitchaya P IndravudhDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4013-7645
Kathleen McGeeDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5054-977X
Euphemia L SibandaCentre for Sexual Health and HIV/AIDS Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1754-1076
Elizabeth L CorbettMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Katherine FieldingDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6524-3754
Fern Terris-PrestholtDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1693-5196

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Control of infectious diseases is a global health priority and a target of the 2015-2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Community participation is fundamental to advancing primary health care and meeting SDGs. We conducted a mixed-methods systematic literature review of quantitative and qualitative evidence to understand the health, social, and economic impact of community-led strategies for communicable disease prevention and management in low- and middle- income countries. We searched seven electronic databases through 31 December, 2023 for cluster-randomised trials and economic evaluations of community-led communicable disease control. Reference searches identified additional studies associated with eligible database records. Data extraction and narrative synthesis summarised evidence on impact, costs, and cost-effectiveness, described the nature and extent of community participation, and examined implementation, mechanisms of impact, and contexts. Risk of bias of was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool and the Drummond checklist. Our database search yielded 14,269 records. Following database and reference screening, we included 49 records across 16 unique cluster-randomised trials, mostly from sub-Saharan Africa. Communicable disease strategies included provision of biomedical products, environmental modifications, and education and outreach. Based on evidence with moderate risk of bias, we found that community-led strategies can improve health behaviours for diarrhoeal diseases, HIV, malaria, and neglected tropical diseases. Evidence for impact on mortality and morbidity, health care access and utilisation, and community and social outcomes was less conclusive. Impact depended on the intensity of implementation by community actors. Factors facilitating implementation included motivation, trust, and health systems engagement. Contextual influences included attitudes and norms around communicable diseases. Economic studies were few and many omitted societal costs and consequences. This review supports community-led communicable disease control as a potentially effective strategy to improve health behaviours and contribute to SDGs. Operational guidance for implementation and evaluation is critical to support rapid evidence generation in this important area.

Identifiers

PMID40173193
PMCPMC11964228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.