Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40173188›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Accessibility and quality of care for adults with hypertension in rural Burkina Faso: results from a cross-sectional household survey.

Stephanie Lacey, Maria Lisa Odland, Ali Sié, Guy Harling, Till Bärnighausen, Pascal Geldsetzer, Lisa R Hirschhorn, Justine I Davies

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephanie LaceyInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3046-9141
Maria Lisa OdlandInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-7145
Ali SiéCentre de Recherche en Santé de Nouna, Nouna, Burkina Faso.
Guy HarlingInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6604-491X
Till BärnighausenHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Pascal GeldsetzerDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Lisa R HirschhornDepartment of Medical Social Science, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4355-7437
Justine I DaviesInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing quality healthcare is essential to reduce the future burden of cardiovascular disease. We assessed the quality of care for people with hypertension in Burkina Faso using the Institute of Medicine (IoM) Quality Domains of effectiveness, timeliness of access, patient-centredness and equitability of care. We performed an analysis of cross-sectional household survey data collected from a population-representative sample of 4000 adults ≥40 years in Nouna, Burkina Faso in 2018. For people with hypertension, effectiveness was assessed through care cascades describing the proportion who were screened, diagnosed, treated, and achieved hypertension control; timeliness was defined as access to care within the last three months. Patient-centredness was described using experiential quality process and outcome measures (dichotomised as higher or lower quality [score above or below and including the median, respectively]; a shared understanding and decision-making (SUDM) variable was described. Equity was assessed for effectiveness, timeliness, and patient-centredness in multivariable analyses including socio-demographic factors. In total, 1006 participants with hypertension were included. Hypertension prevalence was 34.8%; 62.3% had been screened, 42.9% diagnosed, 15.0% treated, and 6.8% were controlled; 26.8% had accessed care within the last three months. Overall, 61.8% of participants had a positive view of the health service. Clarity of communication and opinion of medical provider knowledge were the best-rated experiential quality process variables, with 40.1% and 39.7% of participants´ responses indicating higher quality care respectively. The mean SUDM score was 68.5 (±10.8), range 25.0-100.0. Regarding equity, screening was higher in females, adults with any education, those who were married or cohabiting, and those in the higher wealth quintiles. There were no associations seen between SUDM and sociodemographic variables. Although the prevalence of hypertension was high in this population, the quality of care was not commensurate, with room for improvement in all four IoM Domains assessed.

Identifiers

PMID40173188
PMCPMC11964235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.