ArticlePloS one2025
Socioeconomic disparities in anthropometric status among primary school children: A potential association with school meals.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the growth and nutritional status of children in primary schools across different socioeconomic groups in Wad-Madani City, Central Sudan, and map it to World Health Organization (WHO) standards; and to investigate a potential association between school meal intake and nutritional status.
methodsThis cross-sectional anthropometric study involved a randomly selected sample of 506 children from 10 primary schools in the city. Height and weight were measured following WHO standards and converted into Z-scores for weight-for-age (WAZ), height-for-age (HAZ), and BMI-for-age (BAZ). We compared the mean Z-scores between children in the private and public school sectors, adjusting for ethnicity and other potential predictors. Statistical analyses included multivariate linear regression to assess predictors of growth and nutritional status, alongside group comparisons using appropriate statistical tests.
resultsChildren in public schools had significantly lower BAZ and HAZ levels compared to both WHO standards and private school children. The mean BAZ was -1.0 (SD = 1.23) for public school children and -0.13 (SD = 1.40) for private school children (p = 0.001), with 17.8% (n = 57) of public school children classified as thin (wasted) or severely wasted. The median HAZ was -0.20 (95% CI: -0.34, -0.02) for public school children and 0.19 (95% CI: 0.03, 0.40) for private school children (p < 0.001). Additionally, children in suburban public schools had a significantly lower mean HAZ (-0.46, SD = 11.33) compared to those in urban public schools (p = 0.009). Compared to WHO growth standards, public school children had significantly lower mean WAZ (p < 0.001), HAZ (p = 0.002), and BAZ (p < 0.001). Children who received school meals had significantly higher WAZ (mean difference = 0.619, p = 0.001), HAZ (mean difference = 0.401, p = 0.010), and BAZ (mean difference = 0.588, p = 0.003) across the entire sample. Even within the public-school subgroup, while statistical significance was not reached, all three parameters-WAZ (mean difference = 0.334, p = 0.074), HAZ (mean difference = 0.262, p = 0.123), and BAZ (mean difference = 0.299, p = 0.132)-remained consistently higher among those who received school meals.
conclusionPublic school children exhibit unfavorable growth and nutritional status, which may be attributed to inadequate nutritional and calorie intake. School meals may improve nutritional outcomes. We propose urgent intervention through the provision of nutritionally adequate school meals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.