Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40173080›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2025

Inspiratory and expiratory sinus arrhythmia in healthy human.

Pascale Calabrese, Sophie Lambert-Lacroix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pascale CalabreseUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, UMR 5525, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0009-0002-9661-4084
Sophie Lambert-LacroixUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, UMR 5525, Grenoble, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breathing and ECG were recorded in 33 healthy human subjects at rest. The RR interval was labeled according to its occurrence in the respiratory phases: II (both R waves during inspiration), IE (first R wave in inspiration and following R wave in expiration), EE (both R waves during expiration), and EI (first R wave in expiration and following R wave in inspiration). For each subject, II and EE intervals were plotted versus normalized mean inspiratory duration and normalized mean expiratory duration, respectively, and correlation coefficients and slopes of regression lines were calculated. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare these slopes between and within individuals. These relationships appeared to be linear in most cases, although neither the decrease nor the increase in heart rate occurred at the same rate for all subjects. Overall, the slope associated with II intervals was not higher, in terms of absolute values, than the slope associated with EE intervals for the same subject. Our results underscore the difference between inspiratory and expiratory sinus arrhythmia and suggest that the effects of any stimulation presumed to induce changes in vagal cardiac activity should primarily be sought during expiration.

Indexed as

ExhalationInhalationRespiratory Sinus ArrhythmiaAdultElectrocardiographyFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleYoung Adultexpirationhumaninspirationrespiratory sinus arrhythmiastatistical analyses

Identifiers

PMID40173080
PMCPMC11963900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.