ArticlePhysiological reports2025
Inspiratory and expiratory sinus arrhythmia in healthy human.
Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inspiratory and expiratory sinus arrhythmia in healthy human.Physiological reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breathing and ECG were recorded in 33 healthy human subjects at rest. The RR interval was labeled according to its occurrence in the respiratory phases: II (both R waves during inspiration), IE (first R wave in inspiration and following R wave in expiration), EE (both R waves during expiration), and EI (first R wave in expiration and following R wave in inspiration). For each subject, II and EE intervals were plotted versus normalized mean inspiratory duration and normalized mean expiratory duration, respectively, and correlation coefficients and slopes of regression lines were calculated. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare these slopes between and within individuals. These relationships appeared to be linear in most cases, although neither the decrease nor the increase in heart rate occurred at the same rate for all subjects. Overall, the slope associated with II intervals was not higher, in terms of absolute values, than the slope associated with EE intervals for the same subject. Our results underscore the difference between inspiratory and expiratory sinus arrhythmia and suggest that the effects of any stimulation presumed to induce changes in vagal cardiac activity should primarily be sought during expiration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.