Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40172885›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Uterine Fibroid Diagnosis by Race and Ethnicity in an Integrated Health Care System.

Susanna D Mitro, Wendy Dyer, Catherine Lee, Ameek Bindra, Lana Wang, Miranda Ritterman Weintraub, Monique M Hedderson, Eve Zaritsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of uterine fibroids.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  8. Diagnosis and classification of uterine fibroids.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Susanna D MitroDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton.
Wendy DyerDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton.
Catherine LeeDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton.
Ameek BindraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Lana WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Miranda Ritterman WeintraubDepartment of Graduate Medical Education, Oakland Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Monique M HeddersonDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton.
Eve ZaritskyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.

Funding

University of California, San Francisco/Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women’s Health (BIRCWH) K12 ProgramK12AR084219 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Monica Gandhi, CYNTHIA C HARPER · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS K12 AR084219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Uterine fibroids are benign tumors that can cause severe symptoms. Fibroid burden among Asian or Pacific Islander individuals, particularly in specific subgroups, remains largely unexamined. Objective: To describe fibroid diagnosis rates by race and ethnicity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study (January 2009 to December 2022) used data from electronic health records of the Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) integrated health care system. Eligible participants included female (sex assigned at birth) KPNC members aged 18 to 54 years with at least 12 months of continuous membership, no prior fibroid diagnosis, and no history of hysterectomy. Data were analyzed January to September 2024. Exposure: Race and ethnicity was categorized into 9 groups: Black (African American, other Black [ie, any Black race or ethnicity not otherwise specified], and unknown Black race or ethnicity), East Asian (Chinese, Japanese, and Korean), Hispanic (Hispanic or Latino), South Asian (Asian Indian, Bangladeshi, East Indian, Nepali, Sri Lankan, and any South Asian ethnicity not otherwise specified), Southeast Asian (Filipino, Vietnamese, and other Southeast Asian [ie, any Southeast Asian ethnicity not otherwise specified]), White (White or White Middle Eastern), other Asian or Pacific Islander (Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, multiethnic Asian, and other or unspecified Asian ethnicity [ie, any Asian ethnicity not otherwise specified]), other races and ethnicities (American Indian or Alaska Native and multiracial), and unknown race or ethnicity. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incident fibroid diagnosis was identified using diagnostic codes. Poisson regression models were used to calculate incidence rates of fibroid diagnosis by racial and ethnic group, standardized to the 2022 US female population. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% CIs compared incidence within each racial and ethnic group with White participants. Results: A total of 1 917 794 patients were included (median [IQR] percentage, 7% [6%-7%] Black; 5% [5%-6%] East Asian; 22% [21%-23%] Hispanic; 3% [2%-3%] South Asian; 7% [7%-8%] Southeast Asian; 42% [39%-45%] White; 8% [6%-10%] other Asian or Pacific Islander; 2% [2%-2%] of other races and ethnicities; 4% [4%-5%] unknown or missing race and ethnicity), and 84 206 patients (4.4%) received a first fibroid diagnosis during the study period. Compared with White patients, there was a higher rate of fibroid diagnosis among Southeast Asian (IRR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.26-1.33), East Asian (IRR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.43-1.51), and South Asian patients (IRR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.65-1.78). Black (IRR, 3.11; 95% CI, 3.05-3.17) and Hispanic patients (IRR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.34-1.39) also had elevated rates of fibroid diagnosis. All Asian patients were less likely than other groups to have ICD-9 or ICD-10 coded symptoms before diagnosis. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of nearly 2 million KPNC patients, South Asian, East Asian, Southeast Asian, Hispanic, and Black patients had higher fibroid diagnosis rates than White patients. If diagnosis rates reflect true variation in disease prevalence, future research should identify sources of these disparities and strategies to reduce them.

Indexed as

EthnicityLeiomyomaRacial GroupsUterine NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAsianAsian American Native Hawaiian and Pacific IslanderCaliforniaDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40172885
PMCPMC11966321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.