ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2025
Parents' Experiences of Holding Their Child for Healthcare Procedures: A Qualitative Exploratory Study.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parents' Perspectives on XR Distraction During Pediatric Needle Procedures.Paediatric & neonatal pain · 2026Article
- Review of paediatric pharmacological and non-pharmacological procedural comfort strategies.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Review
- Effect of physician communication on caregivers' anxiety in pediatric trauma patients: a quasi-experimental study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Restraining hospitalized children for procedures: practices of nursing professionals in Brazil.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Article
- Exploring Parental Experiences of Childhood Ear Health Clinics and Their Acceptability of AI-Based Diagnostic Tools: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo explore parents' experiences of holding children for healthcare procedures in an Australian paediatric hospital setting.
designA qualitative exploratory study was undertaken at a paediatric tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with parents of children who had undergone a procedure during their hospital admission. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsEight parents were interviewed, with four themes becoming apparent from their experiences, representing the multiple roles parents undertook when holding their child for a procedure. Parent as a protector was identified as the overarching role, with all roles involving aspects of parents protecting their child. The remaining roles included comforter-where parents supported their child by providing reassurance and being present; helper-where parents actively sought a role or stepped up to assist during a procedure and enforcer-where at times parents had a belief that to facilitate some procedures holding was necessary. A sliding-scale schema illustrates that these roles are not static, but rather positioned along a continuum, with some parents moving between roles throughout a procedure.
conclusionThis study provided valuable insight into the complexity of parents' involvement when supporting their child during a procedure. The varying roles suggest parents balance the desire for their child to feel safe (holding as a comforter) with wanting to get the procedure done (holding as an enforcer). IMPACT: This research impacts clinicians, parents and children involved in healthcare procedures. Clinicians can use the sliding-scale schema that illustrates the distinct roles parents can take on, as a visual tool to promote parental involvement and help parents define their role during a procedure. REPORTING
methodConsolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guideline was utilised when reporting findings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.