ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026
Multi Perspective Considerations for Health Smart Home: Early Phase Exploratory Study.
Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Renegotiating autonomy and safety: disentangling tensions emerging for older adults living with smart monitoring systems.npj health systems · 2026Article
- A Community-in-the-Loop Approach to Smart Home Monitoring for Aging in Place: Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Co-Designed Prototype.JMIR aging · 2026Article
- Digital health platforms for intrinsic capacity monitoring in community-based integrated care for older adults: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Nursing for Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases: A Scoping Review.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThis study engaged key stakeholders-older adults, family caregivers, home care support workers, nurses, and home healthcare leaders-to explore perspectives on essential components and integration into home care models, and to explore the role of their technology readiness for health smart homes adoption.
designA qualitative methodology with a quantitative component, early-phase exploratory design.
methodsSemi-structured interviews underwent qualitative thematic analysis, with cross-case analysis comparing stakeholder perspectives to identify convergences and divergences. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse Technology Readiness Index (TRI 2.0) survey data to provide background and context to the qualitative findings.
resultsAmong 18 participants-older adults (n = 6), family caregivers (n = 2), nurses (n = 7), and support workers/healthcare leaders (n = 3)-findings reflected optimism for health smart home adoption and its potential to support ageing in place. Nurses and care workers saw health smart home as a tool for improving care coordination and quality of life. Key adoption considerations included education, data visualisation, privacy, and security. Technology readiness scores were moderate, with nurses scoring highest (3.52), followed by caregivers (3.41), support workers (3.13), and older adults (3.10).
conclusionWhile stakeholders were open to integrating health smart home into home care, concerns around usability, security, and training must be addressed to facilitate adoption. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Findings suggest that while health smart home technology holds promise for enhancing ageing in place, varying levels of technology readiness across stakeholders highlight the need for tailored education and support strategies to ensure successful implementation. PROBLEM ADDRESSED: Despite a strong preference for ageing in place among older adults, integrating health smart home technologies into home care remains challenging. Key issues include ensuring intuitive functionality, protecting privacy, and clarifying the roles of caregivers and healthcare professionals in a technology-enhanced care model. This study addresses the critical gap in understanding how health smart home solutions can be effectively tailored to support the diverse needs of older adults, family caregivers, and home care nurses and support workers. MAIN
findingsStakeholders were generally optimistic about health smart home technologies supporting ageing in place and improving quality of life. Nurses and support workers highlighted the need for tailored data visualisations, alert parameters, and clear role guidelines. A novel finding was that older adults and family caregivers viewed health smart home as a way to reduce intrusive monitoring, promote independence, and maintain a familiar living environment. Family caregivers valued the ability to stay involved remotely through activity data, offering reassurance and peace of mind. Across all groups, privacy safeguards were seen as essential, with strong concerns about data security, transparent usage policies, and user control over data sharing. IMPACT: Findings have implications for community-dwelling older adults, family caregivers, home care professionals, researchers, and technology developers. Insights from this study can inform the design of user-friendly health smart home technologies, shape future research, and guide tailored implementation strategies in home care settings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: An advisory group of community-dwelling older adults in Western Australia provided input on study design and methodology. Their recommendations led to the use of one-on-one interviews to ensure accessibility and relevance for older adults when exploring technology readiness and smart home integration. While the advisory group did not contribute to the data itself or its analysis, their feedback shaped the method of engagement to ensure its relevance and accessibility to potential participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.