Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40172792›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2025

Large vestibular schwannoma treated using a cranial nerve sparing approach with planned subtotal microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery: meta-analysis and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) practice guidelines.

Constantin Tuleasca, Rupesh Kotecha, Arjun Sahgal, Antonio de Salles, Laura Fariselli, Ian Paddick, Jean Régis, Jason Sheehan, John H Suh, Shoji Yomo and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Constantin TuleascaNeurosurgery Service, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 44-46, BH-08, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. constantin.tuleasca@gmail.com.
Rupesh KotechaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
Arjun SahgalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Antonio de SallesUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Laura FariselliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Unit of Radiotherapy, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C Besta, Milan, Italy.
Ian PaddickMedical Physics Ltd, Queen Square Radiosurgery Centre, London, UK.
Jean RégisUMR INSERM 1106, Dept of Functional Neurosurgery, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Jason SheehanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
John H SuhDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA.
Shoji Yomo *Division of Radiation Oncology, Aizawa Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan.
Marc Levivier *Neurosurgery Service, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 44-46, BH-08, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a standard of care for small- to medium- size vestibular schwannomas (VS), while the majority of patients with large VS still require microsurgical resection due to potential consequences of long tract and cranial nerve compression, intracranial hypertension or hydrocephalus.

methodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature specific to planned subtotal resection for large VSs followed by SRS to the residual tumor to inform clinical practice guideline development. The Medline and Embase databases were used to apply the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach to search for manuscripts reporting outcomes for large VSs treated with this paradigm, with a search end date of June 1st 2023. Crude outcomes were pooled using weighted random effects.

results12 series met inclusion criteria reporting on treatment outcomes for 677 patients. Overall tumor control was 89.9% (86.9-92.9%, p < 0.001), with tumor stability observed in 43.9% (19.9-68%, p < 0.001) and tumor reduction in 39.9% (57-74.2%, p = 0.02) post-SRS. Facial nerve functional preservation immediately after microsurgery was 88.0% (82.7-93.3%, p < 0.001), improving to 94.4% (91.4-97.4%, p < 0.001) at last follow-up. Cochlear functional preservation immediately after microsurgery was 58.8% (33.2-84.4%, p < 0.001), decreasing to 57.4% (33-81.8%, p < 0.001) at last follow-up.

conclusionsA cranial nerve sparing approach with planned subtotal microsurgical resection and SRS to the residual tumor achieves high rates of tumor control with highly satisfactory outcome of facial and cochlear functional preservation. Clinical practice consensus recommendations on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) are also presented.

Indexed as

Cranial NervesMicrosurgeryNeuroma, AcousticPractice Guidelines as TopicRadiosurgeryHumansCombinedCranial nerve sparingHybridPlanned subtotal resectionVestibular schwannoma

Identifiers

PMID40172792
PMCPMC12106484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.