Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40172773›Full record

ReviewHuman nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.)2025

Core Moral Concepts and the Sense of Fairness in Human Infants.

Luca Surian, Eugenio Parise, Alessandra Geraci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luca SurianDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy. luca.surian@unitn.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6463-2953
Eugenio Parise *CIMeC - Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Alessandra Geraci *Department of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca P2022M9EKK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review recent experimental studies relevant to assess the proposal that human infants possess a sense of fairness that relies on sociomoral knowledge. We propose that this knowledge may include a core concept of justice with four foundational aspects: impartiality, agency, obligatoriness and conflicting claims. Infants' and toddlers' looking times, manual preferences and spontaneous actions provide some evidence for the first three features. Very early-emerging sociomoral evaluations and expectations about resource distributions show that infants process morally relevant information about distributors and recipients, suggesting that they are sensitive to the agency and impartiality constraints. Early evaluations appear to be linked to third-party expressions of praise or admonishment and to the deliverance of rewards and punishment, providing initial support for the obligatoriness constraint. More work is needed to investigate the sensitivity to conflicting claims, to assess the universality of early emerging evaluation skills and to show how core concepts relate to the development of explicit judgments and beliefs about duties and rights.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentMoral DevelopmentMoralsSocial JusticeHumansInfantCognitive DevelopmentCore KnowledgeFairnessInfancyJusticeMoral Judgment

Identifiers

PMID40172773
PMCPMC12058952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.