ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Barriers to discussing fatigue in oncological care: a comparative study of patient perspectives after two decades.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the current status of barriers to cancer-related fatigue management in Chinese patients with breast cancer and its relationship with self-disclosure and adaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies: a cross-sectional study from the perspective of emotion self-regulation theory.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHealthcare providers and oncology patients may assess fatigue differently without direct communication. This study was performed to compare patient barriers to discussing cancer-related fatigue with healthcare providers in 2002 and 2023/24 using the Polish adaptation of the Fatigue Management Barriers Questionnaire (FMBQ). The FMBQ measures the intensity of barriers in communicating with medical staff about fatigue.
methodsThis cross-sectional study with a historical comparison utilized the FMBQ, the Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ-PL), the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and a custom-designed questionnaire. The study was conducted at the turn of 2023 and 2024, with participants recruited during hospitalization in the preoperative period as part of their treatment process.
resultsThe study included 54 women with histopathologically confirmed reproductive organ malignancies (68% ovarian cancer, 28% endometrial and cervical cancer). The Polish adaptation of the FMBQ demonstrated good psychometric properties, which have been preliminarily confirmed. No significant correlations were found between barriers to communication and fatigue intensity, illness duration, or length of treatment. Two decades after the first study on barriers to discussing fatigue, these barriers persist and have intensified. This is particularly evident in concerns regarding the futility of addressing fatigue, the fear of jeopardizing cancer treatment, and the avoidance of the topic due to concerns that fatigue may signal disease progression. Additionally, patients report an increased need to maintain the image of a "good patient" by avoiding complaints, along with growing concerns about excessive medication use. The percentage of patients not asked about fatigue by medical staff has remained consistent over time (25%-33%). Present-day key barriers to discussing fatigue include the desire to limit medication intake (53%), the effort to maintain a "good patient" image (49%), the belief that fatigue is a less important issue (42%), and fears that it is either a side effect of treatment (38%) or an indicator of disease progression (36%).
conclusionsBarriers to discussing fatigue remain a significant issue in cancer care. Addressing these barriers through education and structured communication strategies could enhance supportive care for oncology patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40172702What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.