ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2025
Vancomycin-based tracers guiding in situ visualization of bacteria on osteosynthesis devices and surgical debridement.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- In vivo bacteria-targeted imaging with vancomycin-based positron emission tomography and optical tracers in an orthopaedic trauma implant infection model.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- The dual role of the microbiome in chronic wound management.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- A scoping review on potential of novel developments in fever of unknown origin and inflammation of unknown origin: long-axial-field-of-view positron emission tomography/computed tomography and novel radiotracers.The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of... · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBacterial infections associated with musculoskeletal injuries are challenging to detect and distinguish from sterile inflammation. Here we present the combined first-time application of a bacteria-targeted positron emission tomography (PET) tracer and a near-infrared fluorescent tracer to detect infected osteosynthesis implants and guide surgical treatment.
methodsTo this end, osteosynthesis plates covered with bacterial biofilm and pre-incubated with [
resultsPre-debridement, PET imaging showed a significant 2.2-fold higher tracer uptake on biofilm-covered plates compared to plates without biofilm (p < 0.001). Post-debridement, the PET signal was marginal, demonstrating effective biofilm removal. Fluorescence-guided surgery enabled real-time visualization and removal of bacterial biofilms.
conclusionCombined preoperative PET and intraoperative fluorescence imaging with vancomycin-based tracers allows noninvasive detection and real-time infection management, as demonstrated by these preliminary findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.