Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40172681›Full record

Observational studyClinical and experimental medicine2025

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of belimumab and telitacicept in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a retrospective, observational study.

Tianxiao Feng, Manyu Zhang, Jieying Wang, Yang Li, Yang Cui

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Research progress on the application of telitacicept in rheumatism and autoimmune diseases].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tianxiao Feng *Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-0831-6678
Manyu Zhang *Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3443-0521
Jieying WangDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5570-7087
Yang LiDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China. liyang@gdph.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6766-048X
Yang CuiDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China. 13602835538@139.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6053-5571

Funding

Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project 202201011346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This investigation aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of belimumab and telitacicept in active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to explore potential predictors within a treat-to-target paradigm. 101 individuals were retrospectively enrolled at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital between January 2021 and December 2023, receiving either belimumab (n = 50) or telitacicept (n = 51) in conjunction with standard therapy for more than 24 weeks. Key clinical endpoints were evaluated, with lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) as the primary outcome. Multivariate analysis was employed to investigate factors associated with failure to attain LLDAS. Baseline characteristics were balanced in both groups after propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting. At 24 weeks, the rates of attainment of LLDAS were 54.86% in the telitacicept group and 33.13% in patients receiving belimumab (p = 0.048). A larger proportion of patients receiving telitacicept attained prednisone dosages of ≤ 7.5 mg/day (p = 0.012). Improvements in complement C4 levels and the occurrence of severe hypogammaglobulinemia were more pronounced among patients receiving telitacicept, with no differences in SLE Responder Index 4, DORIS remission, and renal response. Treatment with telitacicept (OR = 0.80, p = 0.032) and elevated levels of complement C3 (OR = 0.63, p = 0.003) were associated with a decreased risk of failing to achieve LLDAS. No severe adverse events were documented in both groups. Both belimumab and telitacicept displayed satisfactory effectiveness and safety profiles. Our findings imply telitacicept may offer potential benefits associated with the early attainment of LLDAS and reduced glucocorticoid exposure. Restricted by the observational design, the findings require further validation in prospective studies.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmunosuppressive AgentsLupus Erythematosus, SystemicAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrednisoneRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedbelimumabImmunosuppressive AgentsPrednisoneRecombinant Fusion ProteinstelitaciceptBelimumabIPTWLLDASSystemic lupus erythematosusTelitacicept

Identifiers

PMID40172681
PMCPMC11965181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.