Observational studyClinical and experimental medicine2025
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of belimumab and telitacicept in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from a retrospective, observational study.
Observational study in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Telitacicept versus Belimumab in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of telitacicept for rituximab-refractory membranous nephropathy.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- [Research progress on the application of telitacicept in rheumatism and autoimmune diseases].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2026Review
- Novel use of telitacicept in primary immune thrombocytopenia: a case report.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- A BAFF/APRIL dual inhibitor for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a long-term, observational, real-world study.Arthritis research & therapy · 2026Observational
- Effectiveness and safety of belimumab and telitacicept in active systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Cost-utility analysis of telitacicept versus belimumab in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- A case report of telitacicept in the treatment of immunocompromised and refractory lupus nephritis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This investigation aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of belimumab and telitacicept in active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to explore potential predictors within a treat-to-target paradigm. 101 individuals were retrospectively enrolled at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital between January 2021 and December 2023, receiving either belimumab (n = 50) or telitacicept (n = 51) in conjunction with standard therapy for more than 24 weeks. Key clinical endpoints were evaluated, with lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) as the primary outcome. Multivariate analysis was employed to investigate factors associated with failure to attain LLDAS. Baseline characteristics were balanced in both groups after propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting. At 24 weeks, the rates of attainment of LLDAS were 54.86% in the telitacicept group and 33.13% in patients receiving belimumab (p = 0.048). A larger proportion of patients receiving telitacicept attained prednisone dosages of ≤ 7.5 mg/day (p = 0.012). Improvements in complement C4 levels and the occurrence of severe hypogammaglobulinemia were more pronounced among patients receiving telitacicept, with no differences in SLE Responder Index 4, DORIS remission, and renal response. Treatment with telitacicept (OR = 0.80, p = 0.032) and elevated levels of complement C3 (OR = 0.63, p = 0.003) were associated with a decreased risk of failing to achieve LLDAS. No severe adverse events were documented in both groups. Both belimumab and telitacicept displayed satisfactory effectiveness and safety profiles. Our findings imply telitacicept may offer potential benefits associated with the early attainment of LLDAS and reduced glucocorticoid exposure. Restricted by the observational design, the findings require further validation in prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.