ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Physical activity and risk of cancer mortality in patients with and without cancer: is there a dose-response relationship?
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dose-response relationship between physical activity and mental health outcomes in adolescents.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to examine a dose-response association between aerobic physical activity (APA) and muscle-strengthening exercise (MSE) and their combinations with cancer mortality.
methodsThe final 575,439 participants involved in this study were derived from 1997 to 2018 longitudinal follow-up data collected in the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). The APA and MSE were requested via self-reported questionnaires. These records are linked to the National Death Index and classified as cancer deaths based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). Statistical analysis was performed by Wilcoxon rank-sum test, chi-square test, and the Cox proportional hazards models.
resultsAfter adjusting for all covariates, the results demonstrated that the cancer mortality risk for cancer survivors decreased by 23.2%, 35.8%, 42.5%, and 46.7% for those engaging in 0-7.4 MET hours/week, 7.5-14.9 MET hours/week, 15-29.9 MET hours/week, and 30 + MET hours/week, respectively. For non-cancer patients, the cancer mortality risk decreased by 6.9%, 11.9%, 15.1%, and 16.7%. Furthermore, the results showed that the cancer mortality risk for cancer survivors decreased by 34.9%, 30.2%, 32.3%, and 10% for those engaging in 2-3 times/week, 4-5 times/week, 6-7 times/week, and 8 + times/week. For non-cancer patients, the cancer mortality risk decreased by 17.4%, 23.7%, 9.5%, and 10.6%. Among non-cancer patients with insufficient MSE, there was no significant negative correlation between APA and cancer mortality.
conclusionThe optimal dose response in reducing the risk of cancer mortality may occur at higher levels of APA with MSE 4-5 times/week and 2-3 times/week for primary and secondary prevention. In addition, primary prevention derives a greater advantage from MSE, and a protocol of APA should be emphasized in secondary prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40172680What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.